January 2024 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1217417] Realtek RTL-8126 Network Driver
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217417 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217417#c33 --- Comment #33 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- OK, it sounds promising. The firmware isn't mandatory, and it's more about the configuration adjustment. So it's no surprise that the driver works without the firmware. Let's hope that the upstream dev submits the proper patch in a near future. Then we can backport it to TW kernel, and that's it all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1217417] Realtek RTL-8126 Network Driver
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217417 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217417#c32 --- Comment #32 from Joe S <jmscdba(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #31) > I'm not sure which side broke the space, but maybe it's Thunderbird. > The easiest way would would have been to just put Cc to me while > communicating with the upstream dev. Then I'll receive the original mail :) > > In anyway, please let me know the result with the new test kernel. That's > the most interesting part. You may be right about it being TB. I purposely had not included you on the upstream emails so I didn't waste your time until I had something concrete back from upstream but I will now make sure you are included on those emails. I just replied to upstream with the results of the test with the new kernel and will include it below so that you have the results in this bug report too. I just installed the test kernel provided with both patches. Here is the dmesg | grep 8169 output using this new test kernel [ 3.630222] r8169 0000:05:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0003) [ 3.632148] r8169 0000:05:00.0 eth0: RTL8126A, e8:9c:25:78:c9:bf, XID 649, IRQ 207 [ 3.632150] r8169 0000:05:00.0 eth0: jumbo features [frames: 9194 bytes, tx checksumming: ko] [ 3.633218] r8169 0000:05:00.0 enp5s0: renamed from eth0 [ 4.212381] r8169 0000:05:00.0: Direct firmware load for rtl_nic/rtl8126a-2.fw failed with error -2 [ 4.212384] r8169 0000:05:00.0: Unable to load firmware rtl_nic/rtl8126a-2.fw (-2) [ 4.236119] RTL8251B 5Gbps PHY r8169-0-500:00: attached PHY driver (mii_bus:phy_addr=r8169-0-500:00, irq=MAC) [ 4.349625] r8169 0000:05:00.0 enp5s0: Link is Down [ 7.858055] r8169 0000:05:00.0 enp5s0: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx Although dmesg has these 2 error messages, I have network connectivity, ran a quick speed test and am getting the correct speeds. [ 4.212381] r8169 0000:05:00.0: Direct firmware load for rtl_nic/rtl8126a-2.fw failed with error -2 [ 4.212384] r8169 0000:05:00.0: Unable to load firmware rtl_nic/rtl8126a-2.fw (-2) Here is the 'lsmod | grep 8169' results so you can see what is loaded r8169 114688 0 mdio_devres 12288 1 r8169 libphy 245760 3 r8169,mdio_devres,realtek I will continue to test and report back if there are any network issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1217417] Realtek RTL-8126 Network Driver
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217417 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217417#c31 --- Comment #31 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- I'm not sure which side broke the space, but maybe it's Thunderbird. The easiest way would would have been to just put Cc to me while communicating with the upstream dev. Then I'll receive the original mail :) In anyway, please let me know the result with the new test kernel. That's the most interesting part. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1219372] New: WSL from Microsoft store is x86_64 instead of arm64
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219372 Bug ID: 1219372 Summary: WSL from Microsoft store is x86_64 instead of arm64 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: aarch64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: WSL Assignee: sle-ms(a)suse.de Reporter: guillaume.gardet(a)arm.com QA Contact: qa-c(a)suse.de CC: afaerber(a)suse.com, ddavis(a)suse.com Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- openSUSE Tumbleweed WSL from Microsoft store is the x86_64 flavor instead of arm64. Installing manually from arm64 appx [0] is fine. [0]: https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:WSL#With_Appx_from_openSUSE_download_server -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1216738] ERROR SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is in the future, ..., returning error
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216738 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216738#c4 --- Comment #4 from Jan Zerebecki <jzerebecki(a)suse.com> --- https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-build/pull/977 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1217417] Realtek RTL-8126 Network Driver
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217417 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217417#c30 --- Comment #30 from Joe S <jmscdba(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #29) > The updated kernel is being built in OBS home:tiwai:bsc1217417-2 repo. > It'll appear later at > > http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/tiwai:/bsc1217417-2/standar… > Give it a try. > > BTW, at the next time, please just do the direct forward of the mail to me. > The way you forwarded broke the tabs and spaces in the patch, which made it > inapplicable. I had to edit all lines manually. Thanks Takashi, sorry you had that issue with the email. I didn't do anything different from when I forward the first patch from upstream. I use Thunderbird for email and just hit forward on upstream's email and typed in your email address. Possibly the issue is because the upstream developer hit reply to me and then when I forward that to you it already had the problem ? Otherwise, I'm not sure what you want me to do differently if there is another patch but if you want me to do something other than hitting forward just let me know and I am happy to do it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1219401] [Build 20240130] openssl packaging changes require apparmor profile update
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219401 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219401#c6 --- Comment #6 from Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar(a)opensuse.org> --- for reference, openssl 1.1 uses 5+- Because OpenSSL 1.1.1 is no longer default, let's rename engine 6+ directories to contain version of OpenSSL and let unversioned for 7+ the default OpenSSL. [bsc#1194187, bsc#1207472, bsc#1218933] 8+ * /etc/ssl/engines.d -> /etc/ssl/engines1_1.d 9+ * /etc/ssl/engdef.d -> /etc/ssl/engdef1_1.d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1219401] [Build 20240130] openssl packaging changes require apparmor profile update
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219401 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219401#c5 Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar(a)opensuse.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(dimstar@opensuse. | |org) | CC| |otto.hollmann(a)suse.com --- Comment #5 from Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar(a)opensuse.org> --- The spec file explains the new location like this: - Added openssl-3-use-include-directive.patch so that the default /etc/ssl/openssl.cnf file will include any configuration files that other packages might place into /etc/ssl/engines3.d/ and /etc/ssl/engdef3.d/. Also create symbolic links /etc/ssl/engines.d/ and /etc/ssl/engdef.d/ to above versioned directories. - Updated spec file to create the two new necessary directores for the above patch and two symbolic links to above directories. [bsc#1194187, bsc#1207472, bsc#1218933] The same exists for openssl 1.1 the config include says: ++# This include will look through the directory that will contain the ++# engine declarations for any engines provided by other packages. ++.include /etc/ssl/engines3.d ++ ++# This include will look through the directory that will contain the ++# definitions of the engines declared in the engine section. ++.include /etc/ssl/engdef3.d File names do not have to follow any particular pattern -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1217979] New: package xfsprogs: error while installing libhandle1
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217979 Bug ID: 1217979 Summary: package xfsprogs: error while installing libhandle1 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: comes(a)naic.edu QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- During a tumbleweed installation I saw this error message in /var/log/zypp/history: # 2023-12-11 14:37:08 libhandle1-6.5.0-1.1.x86_64.rpm installed ok # Additional rpm output: # /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ywCvQW: line 2: mkdir: command not found # /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ywCvQW: line 3: touch: command not found # 2023-12-11 14:37:08|install|libhandle1|6.5.0-1.1|x86_64||openSUSE-20231210-0|b9253b5573636c9723bccb7083cdcf371f1d3b9adc1de9045fe144fd2b25d7a6a89df186bf4adf81590 When libhandle1 is installed it runs the post scriptlet %{regenerate_initrd_post} which runs the command mkdir and touch which fail if coreutils is not installed The fix is to add: %package -n %{libname} Summary: XFS Filesystem-specific Shared library Group: Development/Libraries/C and C++ +Requires(post): coreutils in the spec file. I did try to submit a fix branching filesystems:xfsprogs but the branched package was empty. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1192014] provide admin option to NOT automatically REbuild initrds for previously installed kernels
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192014 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192014#c22 --- Comment #22 from OBSbugzilla Bot <bwiedemann+obsbugzillabot(a)suse.com> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1192014) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1143010 Factory / suse-module-tools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0