March 2019 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1128372] offline installation claims to use wicked
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Mar '19

07 Mar '19

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128372 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128372#c1 David Diaz <dgonzalez(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dgonzalez(a)suse.com --- Comment #1 from David Diaz <dgonzalez(a)suse.com> --- According to the logs, `yast2-network 4.1.39` is being used. I think the mentioned bug was fixed in `yast2-network 4.1.40`[1] > - Respect the network backend selected in the proposal at the end of the installation Could you confirm that, Knut? Thanks in advance. [1] https://github.com/yast/yast-network/blob/master/package/yast2-network.chan… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1128329] xmonad 0.13 loses state on restart
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Mar '19

07 Mar '19

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128329 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128329#c3 --- Comment #3 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp(a)suse.de> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1128329) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/682537 42.3 / xmonad https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/682538 15.0 / xmonad -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1127934] dvipdf fails in tumbleweed
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Mar '19

07 Mar '19

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127934 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127934#c2 Johannes Segitz <jsegitz(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|jsmeix(a)suse.com |jsegitz(a)suse.com --- Comment #2 from Johannes Segitz <jsegitz(a)suse.com> --- This is due to the profile. Remove it for now to work around the issue. I'm currently at a conference and will work on this next week -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1125718] pop up with 'Software changed' message after grub update
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Mar '19

07 Mar '19

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125718 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125718#c9 Lukas Ocilka <locilka(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lslezak(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(lslezak(a)suse.com) | |, | |needinfo?(jreidinger(a)suse.c | |om) --- Comment #9 from Lukas Ocilka <locilka(a)suse.com> --- Josef, could you PLS check logs? It seems that Bootloader was called and then the software selection needed to be re-proposed. That IMO looks like a wanted behavior. On the other hand - Did bootloader change anything? It doesn't seem that openQA changed anything there - Why do we need to inform user about it? It doesn't seem that openQA entered the software proposal before and thus there were no manual changes before Please, correct me `where` I'm wrong ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1125841] AppArmor security driver not enabled for QEMU in libvirt
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Mar '19

07 Mar '19

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125841 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125841#c27 --- Comment #27 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp(a)suse.de> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1125841) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/682527 Factory / libvirt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1128372] New: offline installation claims to use wicked
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Mar '19

07 Mar '19

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1128372 Bug ID: 1128372 Summary: offline installation claims to use wicked Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.1 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation Assignee: yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: lnussel(a)suse.com QA Contact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 799286 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=799286&action=edit y2logs did an offline installation from USB stick and chose KDE as desktop environment. The installation summary said that it would use wicked for the network but in the end NM is used as expected. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1121391] GCC 9: xen build fails
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Mar '19

07 Mar '19

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121391 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121391#c5 --- Comment #5 from Charles Arnold <carnold(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #3) > I can't reproduce the -Werror=address-of-packed-member errors (with a gcc > build from mid of December last year). Does the RPM build force any warnings > on that a non-RPM build would not enable? Here is the gcc command for the debug build for e820.c gcc -m64 -DBUILD_ID -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -Wno-unused-local-typedefs -O1 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -nostdinc -fno-builtin -fno-common -Werror -Wredundant-decls -Wno-pointer-arith -Wvla -pipe -D__XEN__ -include /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/xen-4.12.0-testing/xen/include/xen/config.h '-D__OBJECT_FILE__="e820.o"' -Wa,--strip-local-absolute -g -MMD -MF ./.e820.o.d -DXEN_BUILD_EFI -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/xen-4.12.0-testing/xen/include -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/xen-4.12.0-testing/xen/include/asm-x86/mach-generic -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/xen-4.12.0-testing/xen/include/asm-x86/mach-default -DXEN_IMG_OFFSET=0x200000 '-D__OBJECT_LABEL__=arch$x86$e820.o' -msoft-float -fno-stack-protector -fno-exceptions -Wnested-externs -DHAVE_AS_VMX -DHAVE_AS_SSE4_2 -DHAVE_AS_EPT -DHAVE_AS_RDRAND -DHAVE_AS_FSGSBASE -DHAVE_AS_RDSEED -U__OBJECT_LABEL__ -DHAVE_AS_QUOTED_SYM '-D__OBJECT_LABEL__=arch/x86/e820.o' -DHAVE_AS_INVPCID -DHAVE_AS_NEGATIVE_TRUE -DHAVE_AS_NOPS_DIRECTIVE -mno-red-zone -fpic -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mno-sse -mskip-rax-setup -DGCC_HAS_VISIBILITY_ATTRIBUTE -mindirect-branch=thunk-extern -mindirect-branch-register -DCONFIG_INDIRECT_THUNK -fno-jump-tables -Wa,-I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/xen-4.12.0-testing/xen/include -DBUILD_ID_EFI -c e820.c -o e820.o The only difference in flags between the debug and non debug are, Debug: -O1 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -g Non-Debug: -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1098017] go1.10 fails to rebuild on Leap15 ppc64le
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Mar '19

07 Mar '19

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098017 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098017#c15 --- Comment #15 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp(a)suse.de> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1098017) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/682523 Factory / podman -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1127934] dvipdf fails in tumbleweed
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Mar '19

07 Mar '19

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127934 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127934#c1 Johannes Meixner <jsmeix(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jsegitz(a)suse.com Found By|--- |Community User --- Comment #1 from Johannes Meixner <jsmeix(a)suse.com> --- Vidar Gudmundsson do you have a /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.gs file? I cannot reproduce it but perhaps it might be related to https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/672434 and https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/673382 but I don't use AppArmor. This new AppArmor profile prevents execution of executables. It seems it may prevent execution of executables for all /usr/bin{dvipdf,eps2eps,gs,gsbj,gsdj,gsdj500,gslj,gslp,gsnd,ps2ascii,ps2epsi,ps2pdf,ps2pdf12,ps2pdf13,ps2pdf14,ps2pdfwr,ps2ps,ps2ps2} But I know nothing about how AppArmor works. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1127861] New: strace build fail
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Mar '19

07 Mar '19

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1127861 Bug ID: 1127861 Summary: strace build fail Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.1 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: sbrabec(a)suse.com Reporter: lnussel(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: ptesarik(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- we saw an strace build fail in staging. Currently things are rebuilding again but I don't expect this to go away. Is this caused by the new kernel submission? https://build.opensuse.org/public/build/openSUSE:Leap:15.1:Staging:E/standa… [ 154s] FAIL: strace-k [ 154s] ============== [ 154s] [ 154s] expected: "getpid f3 f2 f1 f0 main " [ 154s] result: "__libc_start_main " [ 154s] getpid() = 14106 [ 154s] > [vdso]() [0xdb9] [ 154s] > /lib/libc-2.26.so(__libc_start_main+0xf3) [0x187b3] [ 154s] > unexpected_backtracing_error [0x5663a000] [ 154s] +++ exited with 0 +++ [ 154s] strace-k.test: failed test: ../../strace -e getpid -k ../stack-fcall output mismatch [ 154s] [ 154s] + exit 1 [ 154s] error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yeq5Af (%check) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3