May 2017 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1026712] installation failed to remove vg when a cached LV is present
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 May '17

04 May '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026712 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026712#c8 --- Comment #8 from Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca(a)tre-sc.jus.br> --- Yes, it is now writable on Tumbleweed. Maybe it has changed since I open the bug 3 months ago ;) It is still a symlink on OpenSUSE LEAP 42.2: /etc/lvm -> /mounts/mp_0000/etc/lvm Anyway, I guess the next LEAP will get Tumbleweed installation anyway. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1036283] EMU: samba: fix for CVE-2017-2619 causes regression with "follow symlinks = no"
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 May '17

04 May '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036283 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036283#c7 Noel Power <nopower(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(nopower(a)suse.com) | --- Comment #7 from Noel Power <nopower(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Peter Simons from comment #6) > (In reply to Panagiotis Georgiadis from comment #5) > > Do we have a reproducer? In case of 'yes', could you please provide the > > required steps? > > The respective first message of > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12721 and > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436145 describe how users > produced the issue on their servers. Unfortunately, the information given is > not very detailed and I'm not sure it's obvious to everyone how to translate > into concrete steps. It's certainly not obvious to me. Maybe the package > maintainer can help? No, it's not clear to me either, however the patches ported contain a test (only runnable from a dev build) and I ran that test succsessfully. I'll have a play with it again tomorrow to see if I can get a simple reporducer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1036283] EMU: samba: fix for CVE-2017-2619 causes regression with "follow symlinks = no"
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 May '17

04 May '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036283 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036283#c6 Peter Simons <peter.simons(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmcdonough(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(jmcdonough(a)suse.c | |om), | |needinfo?(nopower(a)suse.com) --- Comment #6 from Peter Simons <peter.simons(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Panagiotis Georgiadis from comment #5) > Do we have a reproducer? In case of 'yes', could you please provide the > required steps? The respective first message of https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12721 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436145 describe how users produced the issue on their servers. Unfortunately, the information given is not very detailed and I'm not sure it's obvious to everyone how to translate into concrete steps. It's certainly not obvious to me. Maybe the package maintainer can help? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1036283] EMU: samba: fix for CVE-2017-2619 causes regression with "follow symlinks = no"
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 May '17

04 May '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036283 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036283#c5 Panagiotis Georgiadis <pgeorgiadis(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pgeorgiadis(a)suse.com --- Comment #5 from Panagiotis Georgiadis <pgeorgiadis(a)suse.com> --- Do we have a reproducer? In case of 'yes', could you please provide the required steps? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 961258] reference to non-existing unit in SuSE2firewall_init.service
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 May '17

04 May '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961258 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961258#c8 --- Comment #8 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-RU-2017:1178-1: An update that has 7 recommended fixes can now be installed. Category: recommended (moderate) Bug References: 1014987,785299,841046,847193,906136,938727,961258 CVE References: Sources used: SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for Raspberry Pi 12-SP2 (src): SuSEfirewall2-3.6.312-2.3.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12-SP2 (src): SuSEfirewall2-3.6.312-2.3.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12-SP1 (src): SuSEfirewall2-3.6.312-2.3.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 12-SP2 (src): SuSEfirewall2-3.6.312-2.3.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 12-SP1 (src): SuSEfirewall2-3.6.312-2.3.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 841046] SuSEfirewall2: support IPv6 in FW_TRUSTED_NETS
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 May '17

04 May '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841046 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841046#c7 --- Comment #7 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-RU-2017:1178-1: An update that has 7 recommended fixes can now be installed. Category: recommended (moderate) Bug References: 1014987,785299,841046,847193,906136,938727,961258 CVE References: Sources used: SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for Raspberry Pi 12-SP2 (src): SuSEfirewall2-3.6.312-2.3.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12-SP2 (src): SuSEfirewall2-3.6.312-2.3.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12-SP1 (src): SuSEfirewall2-3.6.312-2.3.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 12-SP2 (src): SuSEfirewall2-3.6.312-2.3.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 12-SP1 (src): SuSEfirewall2-3.6.312-2.3.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1014987] sporadic failure of SuSEfirewall2_init during boot
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 May '17

04 May '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014987 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014987#c7 --- Comment #7 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-RU-2017:1178-1: An update that has 7 recommended fixes can now be installed. Category: recommended (moderate) Bug References: 1014987,785299,841046,847193,906136,938727,961258 CVE References: Sources used: SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for Raspberry Pi 12-SP2 (src): SuSEfirewall2-3.6.312-2.3.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12-SP2 (src): SuSEfirewall2-3.6.312-2.3.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12-SP1 (src): SuSEfirewall2-3.6.312-2.3.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 12-SP2 (src): SuSEfirewall2-3.6.312-2.3.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 12-SP1 (src): SuSEfirewall2-3.6.312-2.3.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1035062] Tumbleweed no longer executes scripts in /etc/init.d
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 May '17

04 May '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035062 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035062#c16 --- Comment #16 from Bernhard Wiedemann <bwiedemann(a)suse.com> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1035062) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/492882 Factory / insserv-compat -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1031855] New: lio-mibs description needs corrections
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 May '17

04 May '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031855 Bug ID: 1031855 Summary: lio-mibs description needs corrections Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: behlert(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: hare(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- The description of the lio-mibs package is identical to the one from lio-utils (both coming from the same source package). This is unfortunate, as it doesn't tell you what lio-mibs is useful for. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1037511] Cannot use CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION: virtualbox-host-source should require libelf-devel
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 May '17

04 May '17

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1037511 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1037511#c1 Larry Finger <Larry.Finger(a)lwfinger.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #1 from Larry Finger <Larry.Finger(a)lwfinger.net> --- Thanks for the report. The spec files for Factory and Leap 42.2 update have been modified. This change will be implemented as soon as I update the package. That may be a few days as more important updates are currently building and I do not wish to supersede them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0