March 2009 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 449572] New: Screensaver isn't activated on battery power.
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 05 Mar '09

05 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449572 Summary: Screensaver isn't activated on battery power. Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Final Platform: x86 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.0 Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: GNOME AssignedTo: bnc-team-gnome(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: jsung(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de CC: aliao(a)novell.com Found By: --- When the computer is on battery power and idle after a certain duration, the screensaver isn't activated. Instead, the LCD is turned off directly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 450754] New: Time inaccurate on FIC CW0A0
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 05 Mar '09

05 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450754 Summary: Time inaccurate on FIC CW0A0 Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Final Platform: i586 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.0 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: jsung(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de CC: aliao(a)novell.com, machen(a)novell.com Found By: --- Hi, According to FIC's report, after setting CW0A0's CMOS time and let it idle for one day, they found that system time is fatser or slower than the wall clock. 15 sets CW0A0 are tested, 7 sets of them are 1 minute slower, and the other 8 sets are 2~19 minutes faster. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 450759] New: Auto login of GDM failed sometimes
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 05 Mar '09

05 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450759 Summary: Auto login of GDM failed sometimes Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Final Platform: i586 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.0 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: GNOME AssignedTo: bnc-team-gnome(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: jsung(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de CC: aliao(a)novell.com, machen(a)novell.com Found By: --- Hi, According to the FIC's report, they found that although the auto login function is enabled on their CW0A0, sometimes GDM still ask for password on login. The fail rate is about 9/1000. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 462731] New: kerry shows ugly first screen
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 05 Mar '09

05 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462731 Summary: kerry shows ugly first screen Product: openSUSE 11.1 Version: Final Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE4 Applications AssignedTo: kde-maintainers(a)suse.de ReportedBy: aj(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: Development see screenshot - this happens on first start. The image is always that kind of broken. Btw. the KDE3 version of kerry does not have this problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 463829] New: OS 11.0 fails drive mount via Sil 3124 sata card; OK if using gParted LIVE CD
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 05 Mar '09

05 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463829 User pgnet.trash(a)gmail.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463829#c1 Summary: OS 11.0 fails drive mount via Sil 3124 sata card; OK if using gParted LIVE CD Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.0 Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: pgnet.trash(a)gmail.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: Customer summary: Opensuse 11.0 on X86_64 doesn't see external drives via a Sil 3124 sata card. However, gParted Live CD sees/manages them with no probelm. details: I've Opensuse 11.0 installed on X86_64. uname -a Linux server 2.6.25.18-0.2-default #1 SMP 2008-10-21 16:30:26 +0200 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I've installed a SATA controller, a Addonics MultiLane 4X RAID5/JBOD PCI-X Controller which has a Silicon Image Sil 3124 chipset. It's connected to an external enclosure, via Multilane cable, containing two SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB drives. @ system boot, in Silicon Image BIOS config, I turn *off* RAID support, and can quick/low-level format the two drives. If I boot the system from a gParted LIVE CD (http://gparted.sourceforge.net/), I can see the sata_sil24 driver load @ console. Once fully booted, the two external drives show up in the partition editor as "sdc" & "sdd", and can be partitioned at will. If I boot the system to Opensuse 11.0, title openSUSE 11.0 (symlink) CONSOLE=ttyS0 root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz \ root=/dev/system/LV_OS11 resume=/dev/md1 \ showopts vga=0x31a console=tty0 console=ttyS0,57600n8 initrd /initrd the sata drivers are apparently loaded, lsmod | egrep -i "ata|raid|scsi|ide" raid456 147232 0 async_xor 21504 1 raid456 async_memcpy 19840 1 raid456 async_tx 26084 3 raid456,async_xor,async_memcpy xor 22672 2 raid456,async_xor raid0 24832 0 raid1 43136 4 sata_sil24 36100 0 pata_amd 33284 0 sata_nv 46860 8 libata 195232 3 sata_sil24,pata_amd,sata_nv scsi_mod 195160 4 sr_mod,sg,sd_mod,libata dock 29344 1 libata and the PCI card is correctly recognized, lspci | egrep -i "ata|raid|scsi|ide" 00:0d.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation MCP51 IDE (rev a1) 00:0e.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation MCP51 Serial ATA Controller (rev a1) 00:0f.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation MCP51 Serial ATA Controller (rev a1) 04:07.0 RAID bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3124 PCI-X Serial ATA Controller (rev 02) but I can find no trace of the sdc/sdd drives, just ls -1 /dev/sd* /dev/sda /dev/sda1 /dev/sda2 /dev/sda3 /dev/sda4 /dev/sdb /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdb3 /dev/sdb4 which are my internal, Opensuse-containing drives. Here's the disk-related dmesg output that (I think) is relevant: dmesg | egrep -i "^raid|^scsi|^ata|^md|^sd|^pata|^sata" -------- SCSI subsystem initialized sata_nv 0000:00:0e.0: version 3.5 scsi0 : sata_nv scsi1 : sata_nv ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xc800 ctl 0xc480 bmdma 0xc000 irq 22 ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xc400 ctl 0xc080 bmdma 0xc008 irq 22 ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300) ata1.00: ATA-7: ST3250410AS, 3.AAC, max UDMA/133 ata1.00: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32) ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 ata2: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300) ata2.00: ATA-7: ST3250410AS, 3.AAC, max UDMA/133 ata2.00: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32) ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133 scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA ST3250410AS 3.AA PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 scsi 1:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA ST3250410AS 3.AA PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 scsi2 : sata_nv scsi3 : sata_nv ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xbc00 ctl 0xb880 bmdma 0xb400 irq 23 ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xb800 ctl 0xb480 bmdma 0xb408 irq 23 ata3: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) pata_amd 0000:00:0d.0: version 0.3.10 scsi4 : pata_amd scsi5 : pata_amd ata5: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x1f0 ctl 0x3f6 bmdma 0xffa0 irq 14 ata6: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xffa8 irq 15 ata5.00: ATAPI: PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-112D, 1.21, max UDMA/66 ata5: nv_mode_filter: 0x1f39f&0x1f01f->0x1f01f, BIOS=0x1f000 (0xc5000000) ACPI=0x1f01f (30:900:0x11) ata5.00: configured for UDMA/66 scsi 4:0:0:0: CD-ROM PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-112D 1.21 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 sata_sil24 0000:04:07.0: version 1.1 scsi6 : sata_sil24 scsi7 : sata_sil24 scsi8 : sata_sil24 scsi9 : sata_sil24 ata7: SATA max UDMA/100 host m128@0xfebffc00 port 0xfebf0000 irq 19 ata8: SATA max UDMA/100 host m128@0xfebffc00 port 0xfebf2000 irq 19 ata9: SATA max UDMA/100 host m128@0xfebffc00 port 0xfebf4000 irq 19 ata10: SATA max UDMA/100 host m128@0xfebffc00 port 0xfebf6000 irq 19 ata7: softreset failed (timeout) ata7: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 0) ata7.00: failed to IDENTIFY (INIT_DEV_PARAMS failed, err_mask=0x80) ata7: failed to recover some devices, retrying in 5 secs ata7: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 0) ata7.00: native sectors (2) is smaller than sectors (1953525168) ata7.00: ATA-7: SAMSUNG HD103UJ, 1AA01113, max UDMA7 ata7.00: 1953525168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32) ata7.00: model number mismatch 'SAMSUNG HD103UJ' != '' ata7.00: revalidation failed (errno=-19) ata7: limiting SATA link speed to 1.5 Gbps ata7.00: limiting speed to UDMA/100:PIO3 ata7: failed to recover some devices, retrying in 5 secs ata7: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 10) ata7.00: n_sectors mismatch 1953525168 != 16514064 ata7.00: revalidation failed (errno=-19) ata7.00: disabled ata8: softreset failed (timeout) ata8: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 0) ata8.00: failed to IDENTIFY (INIT_DEV_PARAMS failed, err_mask=0x80) ata8: failed to recover some devices, retrying in 5 secs ata8: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 0) ata8.00: failed to IDENTIFY (INIT_DEV_PARAMS failed, err_mask=0x80) ata8: failed to recover some devices, retrying in 5 secs ata8: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 0) ata8.00: native sectors (2) is smaller than sectors (1953525168) ata8.00: ATA-7: SAMSUNG HD103UJ, 1AA01113, max UDMA7 ata8.00: 1953525168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32) ata8.00: model number mismatch 'SAMSUNG HD103UJ' != '' ata8.00: revalidation failed (errno=-19) ata8.00: disabled ata9: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 0) ata10: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 0) md: raid1 personality registered for level 1 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB) sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB) sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB) sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB) sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk md: raid0 personality registered for level 0 raid6: int64x1 1877 MB/s raid6: int64x2 2605 MB/s raid6: int64x4 1901 MB/s raid6: int64x8 1906 MB/s raid6: sse2x1 2605 MB/s raid6: sse2x2 3312 MB/s raid6: sse2x4 3646 MB/s raid6: using algorithm sse2x4 (3646 MB/s) md: raid6 personality registered for level 6 md: raid5 personality registered for level 5 md: raid4 personality registered for level 4 md: md1 stopped. md: md2 stopped. md: bind<sdb3> md: bind<sda3> raid1: raid set md2 active with 2 out of 2 mirrors md2: bitmap initialized from disk: read 13/13 pages, set 136 bits md: md1 stopped. md: bind<sdb2> md: bind<sda2> raid1: raid set md1 active with 2 out of 2 mirrors md1: bitmap initialized from disk: read 1/1 pages, set 0 bits md: linear personality registered for level -1 sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0 sd 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 0 scsi 4:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 5 md: md0 stopped. md: bind<sdb1> md: bind<sda1> raid1: raid set md0 active with 2 out of 2 mirrors md0: bitmap initialized from disk: read 1/1 pages, set 2 bits md: md3 stopped. md: bind<sdb4> md: bind<sda4> raid1: raid set md3 active with 2 out of 2 mirrors md3: bitmap initialized from disk: read 28/28 pages, set 2 bits -------- Noting above, ... ata8.00: failed to IDENTIFY (INIT_DEV_PARAMS failed, err_mask=0x80) ata8: failed to recover some devices, retrying in 5 secs ... ata8.00: native sectors (2) is smaller than sectors (1953525168) ... ata8.00: model number mismatch 'SAMSUNG HD103UJ' != '' ata8.00: revalidation failed (errno=-19) ... that looks suspicious to my eye, and digging, I've found, http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/linux-ide@vger.kernel.org/8592606.html http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-ide@vger.kernel.org/msg16058.html which @ least refers to the sil driver and mismatch errors ... happy to provide any additional info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 103

[Bug 481193] New: osc build --prefer-pkgs does not scan prefer-pkgs dir to satisfy buildrequires not available on server
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 05 Mar '09

05 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481193 Summary: osc build --prefer-pkgs does not scan prefer-pkgs dir to satisfy buildrequires not available on server Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: BuildService AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: ajorgensen(a)novell.com QAContact: adrian(a)novell.com Found By: --- When I run "osc build --prefer-pkgs /some/dir" I get: Building monsoon.spec for openSUSE_11.1/x86_64 Getting buildinfo from server buildinfo is broken... it says: expansion error: nothing provides somepackage "somepackage" is provided by one of the rpms in /some/dir osc build should satisfy the buildrequire on "somepackage" from the rpm in /some/dir. This bug makes it difficult to package something for which I must also package a dependency. An example is monsoon, the new version requires a separate package of monotorrent but I can't start compiling monsoon until OBS builds monotorrent, even though I have a package built locally which it could use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 462866] New: bluetooth sync with palm no longer works
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 05 Mar '09

05 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462866 Summary: bluetooth sync with palm no longer works Product: openSUSE 11.1 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.1 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Mobile Devices AssignedTo: zoz(a)novell.com ReportedBy: jpschewe(a)mtu.net QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: Customer Under opensuse 11.0 I was able to connect to my Palm using "pilot-xfer -l -p bt:". Now that I've upgraded to 11.1 I can no longer do this. I start listening on the Linux side and when I try and sync from the Palm side I get "Unable to initiate HotSync operation because the port is in use by another application". Syncing to my Mac laptop works just fine still so it seems this a problem on the Linux side. How can I figure out what other application on my Linux machine is talking to the bluetooth and causing this problem or figure out which configuration parameters I need to change for 11.1? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 16

[Bug 481619] New: builds are falsely marked failed
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 Mar '09

04 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481619 Summary: builds are falsely marked failed Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: BuildService AssignedTo: adrian(a)novell.com ReportedBy: poeml(a)novell.com QAContact: adrian(a)novell.com Found By: --- Yesterday and today many people report that the build service marks packages as "failed" that have been built successfully. Triggering a rebuild "fixes" it. I also so this two times today. Once in Apache:Modules/apache2-mod_zrkadlo, once in zypp:Head/zypper. ~/bs/zypp:Head/zypper % osc prjresults libqdialogsolver1 | libsatsolver | | libzypp | | | libzypp-bindings | | | | zypper . . . . f openSUSE_11.1 i586 . . . . . openSUSE_11.1 x86_64 b b b b b openSUSE_Factory i586 b b b b b openSUSE_Factory x86_64 The above is such a case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 482170] New: initrd should be able to mount aufs root filesystems
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 Mar '09

04 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482170 Summary: initrd should be able to mount aufs root filesystems Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.1 Version: Final Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: agraf(a)novell.com ReportedBy: snorp(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- It would be very nice if the initrd could mount / with aufs. This is useful for squashfs/<something> compressed USB installations, for instance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 355868] New: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class javax.crypto.SunJCE_b
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 Mar '09

04 Mar '09

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355868 Summary: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class javax.crypto.SunJCE_b Product: openSUSE 10.3 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Java AssignedTo: bnc-team-java(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: m.munnix(a)redcross.be QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Created an attachment (id=191623) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=191623) java console messages Firefox could not connect to backup appliance due to java error installed packages : MozillaFirefox-2.0.0.10-0.1 MozillaFirefox-translations-2.0.0.10-0.1 java-1_6_0-sun-demo-1.6.0.u3-0.5 java-1_6_0-sun-jdbc-1.6.0.u3-0.5 java-1_6_0-sun-devel-1.6.0.u3-0.5 java-1_6_0-sun-plugin-1.6.0.u3-0.5 java-1_6_0-sun-1.6.0.u3-0.5 java-1_6_0-sun-alsa-1.6.0.u3-0.5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 22