On 10-Aug-01 Vitaly Shishakov wrote:
on Celeron-333@500MHz, SuSE 7.2 Octave 2.0.16 : first time -- 0.011sec, then (stable) -- 0.00175sec
(Ted Harding) wrote:
Any SuSE-7.2 users using octave?
If so, would you oblige me by running the following command in octave (preferably without other system load such as KDE):
tic; for i = 10000000 , end; toc
(that's 1e7), and also report your CPU/MHz?
SORRY!!! That was a typo on my part! It should have been
tic; for i = 1:10000000 , end; toc
Thanks to the people who responded, but please try again!
Thanks,
Ted.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding)
Then: on Celeron-333@500MHz, SuSE 7.2 Octave 2.0.16 : 70.0 secs MATLAB 5.3 : 4.0 secs dont think it's a good reason to compare these two systems. i never used OCTAVE and i wonder -- how well is it compatible with MATLAB 5 (at least) (Ted Harding) wrote:
On 10-Aug-01 Vitaly Shishakov wrote:
on Celeron-333@500MHz, SuSE 7.2 Octave 2.0.16 : first time -- 0.011sec, then (stable) -- 0.00175sec
(Ted Harding) wrote:
Any SuSE-7.2 users using octave?
If so, would you oblige me by running the following command in octave (preferably without other system load such as KDE):
tic; for i = 10000000 , end; toc
(that's 1e7), and also report your CPU/MHz?
SORRY!!! That was a typo on my part! It should have been
tic; for i = 1:10000000 , end; toc
Thanks to the people who responded, but please try again!
Thanks, Ted.
-------------------------------------------------------------------- E-Mail: (Ted Harding)
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972 Date: 11-Aug-01 Time: 00:01:23 ------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------
Hi Vitaly: On Sunday 12 August 2001 04:14 pm, you wrote:
Then:
on Celeron-333@500MHz, SuSE 7.2
Octave 2.0.16 : 70.0 secs
MATLAB 5.3 : 4.0 secs
Octave slow run time is due to the fact that it does not have ATLAS linked
libraries. At least that is what I am told. The relevant info is from John
Eaton creator of Octave:
From: "John W. Eaton"
dont think it's a good reason to compare these two systems. i never used OCTAVE and i wonder -- how well is it compatible with MATLAB 5 (at least)
It is very compatible with MatLab. Many commands are "cognates" or exactly the same. The foo.m files use almost the same syntax. Here is a simple example: function r = dist(x,y) r = sqrt(x*x + y*y); endfunction For the benefit of the other SuSE users, it should be mentioned that MatLab, for non-students, costs a bankrupting $1730.00 (this is not a typo!). Why I could buy a second AMD equipped computer and run dozens of Octaves at the same time with SuSE at that price. -- Cheers, Jonathan
participants (3)
-
Jonathan Drews
-
Ted.Harding@nessie.mcc.ac.uk
-
Vitaly Shishakov