![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/f3311054b36cb65e2cbfaf9ade740d91.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Then: on Celeron-333@500MHz, SuSE 7.2 Octave 2.0.16 : 70.0 secs MATLAB 5.3 : 4.0 secs dont think it's a good reason to compare these two systems. i never used OCTAVE and i wonder -- how well is it compatible with MATLAB 5 (at least) (Ted Harding) wrote:
On 10-Aug-01 Vitaly Shishakov wrote:
on Celeron-333@500MHz, SuSE 7.2 Octave 2.0.16 : first time -- 0.011sec, then (stable) -- 0.00175sec
(Ted Harding) wrote:
Any SuSE-7.2 users using octave?
If so, would you oblige me by running the following command in octave (preferably without other system load such as KDE):
tic; for i = 10000000 , end; toc
(that's 1e7), and also report your CPU/MHz?
SORRY!!! That was a typo on my part! It should have been
tic; for i = 1:10000000 , end; toc
Thanks to the people who responded, but please try again!
Thanks, Ted.
-------------------------------------------------------------------- E-Mail: (Ted Harding)
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972 Date: 11-Aug-01 Time: 00:01:23 ------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------