Matt Archer wrote:
Anders Johansson wrote:
Matt Archer wrote:
Responding with two aliases to the same post now, aaron? Are you trying to make it look as if you're not alone in your opinion?
Your comments are becoming less and less valid.
Yes, KDE developers need bug reports so they can see which functionality people consider important.
Why should anyone fill out bug reports for obscure functionality when basic functionality is still missing. You do that because that's the only valid way for people to add in the missing pieces of code. If you don't tell anyone, nothing changes.
In the time that you and the more vocal complainers have spent bitching to the list about 'KDE4 != KDE3', you could probably have filed 10 bugs and started the process of improving KDE. You prefer to bitch instead of doing something positive
This is like complaining to an auto-design group that the Heater/ventilaation/air-conditionging (HVAC) system doesn't have automatic temperature controls, when they still haven't even designed doors or body panels yet.
The last thing any devs need are premature bug reports.
If you're on this list complaining, it's not premature.
KDE4 was never intended to be a carbon copy of KDE3, there is a lot of cleaning up being done and functionality that isn't missed by anyone will probably not be added back.
But thanks for encouraging people to not report what features they want to see added back. With any luck you can cause KDE4 to lack those features forever. Bravo
But seriously, one alias at a time, ok?
What are you talking about?
Anders
Pete -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org