James (Jim) Hatridge said:
Hi John et al,
[snip]
Another thing to check; do you have a dummy0 device on CW? If so, what happens when you do an "ifconfig dummy0 down" on CW and then do the ping thing.
I took the dummy0 out before all this. Here is the ifconfig command for CW: --------------------------------------------- CW:/root # ifconfig lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1 RX packets:24 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 TX packets:24 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
eth0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr 00:20:18:57:79:F5 inet addr:192.168.17.42 Bcast:192.168.17.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:4803 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 TX packets:5500 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 Interrupt:9 Base address:0x6000
CW:/root # ------------------------------------
And here it is for Opus:
------------------------------------ Opus:/root # ifconfig lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1 RX packets:286 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 TX packets:286 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
eth0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:05:4C:B7:4C inet addr:192.168.17.41 Bcast:192.168.17.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:10130 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 TX packets:8183 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 Interrupt:10 Base address:0x300
Opus:/root #
-----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------- CW:/root # route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.17.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 1 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 1 lo 0.0.0.0 192.168.17.41 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 5 eth0 CW:/root # [snip]
So, what do you guys think?
I think I'm out of ideas. I don't know if it'll help at all but here's a dump of my setup here for comparison. It's very similar to yours.. the only difference being that it's a DSL connection rather than a dialup so I use an "eth" device to connect to the modem rather than a "ppp". I have a system called "fess" that corresponds to your opus and one called "furby" that's like your CW. My ISP gave me a static IP of 63.194.251.2 and my ISP's gateway addr is 63.194.251.254, so your ppp0 dev on opus should look like my eth1 on fess when your link is up. With that in mind, here's what my config looks like.. fess:~ # ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:4B:32:ED:47 inet addr:192.168.42.69 Bcast:192.168.42.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 EtherTalk Phase 2 addr:65280/243 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:2604787 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1985236 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:3 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:20:78:16:36:64 inet addr:63.194.251.2 Bcast:63.194.251.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:811 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:743 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 EtherTalk Phase 2 addr:0/0 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1 RX packets:1029713 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1029713 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 fess:~ # route -nv Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 63.194.251.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 192.168.42.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 0.0.0.0 63.194.251.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 ------------------------------------------------------ furby # ifconfig dummy0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet addr:192.168.42.84 Bcast:192.168.42.255 Mask:255.255.255.255 UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:04:77:F1:B0 inet addr:192.168.42.84 Bcast:192.168.42.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 EtherTalk Phase 2 addr:65280/69 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:7150382 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:3533320 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:321 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 EtherTalk Phase 2 addr:0/0 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1 RX packets:4119 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:4119 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 furby # route -nv Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.42.84 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 1 0 0 dummy0 192.168.42.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 0.0.0.0 192.168.42.69 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 -------------------------------------------------------- The only differences that I can see are: 1) I have a dummy0 on furby (surprised me) 2) ifconfig does not show a broadcast addr for my loopback device 3) I have EtherTalk addresses for my internal ether and loopback devs "3" is just because I run netatalk and should not make any difference. I tried getting rid of the dummy dev on furby and it didn't seem to make any difference one way or the other so "1" is probably irrelevant too (despite my superstitions regarding it). I don't know what to make of "2". I'm running a 2.2 kernel, whereas you're running a 2.0. Probably it's just a reporting difference (I don't show the interrupt and io port stuff either). Hope that doesn't confuse the issue. -John -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/