Hi, -----Original Message----- From: George Toft [SMTP:grtoft@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 12:17 AM
James (Jim) Hatridge wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, George Toft wrote:
Show us the outputs of these commands from opus: route -n
This is "route -n" when online:
Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref
Use
Iface 195.189.80.67 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0 192.168.17.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 2 lo 0.0.0.0 195.189.80.67 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 3 ppp0 Opus:/root #
-------------------------------------- This is it offline:
Opus:/root # route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.17.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 2 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 3 lo Opus:/root # ----------------------------------------
cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward Opus:/root # cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward 1 Opus:/root #
*************************************************************
Show us the outputs of these commands from cw: route -n
This is the same both online and offline: ------------------------------------------- CW:/root # route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.17.42 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 dummy0 192.168.17.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 1 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 1 lo 0.0.0.0 192.168.17.41 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 3 eth0 CW:/root # ---------------------------------------------------
cat /etc/resolv.conf search straubing.baynet.de popmail.straubing.baynet.de smtpmail.straubing.baynet.de nameserver 195.189.80.68 nameserver 195.189.80.62 nameserver 195.189.0.39 CW:/root #
So, any ideas?
Thanks for your help!
Sorry it took so long to reply - Monday-Wednesday are real bad for me. Assuming opus' eth1 IP address is 192.168.17.41, this I cannot see why this does not work.
Is opus' eth1 IP address 192.168.17.41?
Anyone else see anything?
Just noticed the dummy0 line in CW's output, my experience has shown it to be a bit bucket for samba and netatalk, it looks like the same is happening here. I forgot the earlier part of this thread, can your (re)post the ifconfig output. Tim -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
Hi all, On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Tim Duggan wrote:
Sorry it took so long to reply - Monday-Wednesday are real bad for me. Assuming opus' eth1 IP address is 192.168.17.41, this I cannot see why this does not work.
Is opus' eth1 IP address 192.168.17.41?
Anyone else see anything?
Just noticed the dummy0 line in CW's output, my experience has shown it to be a bit bucket for samba and netatalk, it looks like the same is happening here. I forgot the earlier part of this thread, can your (re)post the ifconfig output.
Ok, I think I've got the problem found. When I do this command: ___________________________ Opus:/root # ipfwadm -Ml IP masquerading entries Opus:/root # ------------------- I get nothing. I believe that I should have something here but do not know what or how to get it where it goes. Can someone help me with this command? BTW I've read the howto I still can't get it going. Thanks! Jim Hatridge hatridge@straubing.baynet.de Proud Linux User #88484 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jim's Beowulf Project Looking for giveaway computers and parts I need it all! Email Jim for details on how you can help build a poor man's super computer. -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
Hi, Finally got Samba up and running, I can highly recommend 'Using Samba' (www.kneschke.de/projekte/ksamba/using_samba). What I now want to do is to set up a directory(s) that will allow storage of documents, but different users have access to different ones. e.g. User A - Read/Write all documents in directory User B - Read/Write subset of User A's documents User C - Read/Write subset of User B's documents ...etc.... User Z - No access to documents but can back up whole directory(s) to tape, but cannot access anything on the tape from another machine. I am sure this has been done a million times before, and I have a few ideas, but would appreciate some suggestions. The easiest way I can see is to set up a directory for each user and set it up so each user can only access their own directory and those 'lower', but ideally would want to use one directory for each user. It does not matter if the user can see documents that they are not authorised to read. The users will be using Windoze boxes connecting through Samba. Many thanks Phil -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
Just noticed the dummy0 line in CW's output, my experience has shown it to be a bit bucket for samba and netatalk, it looks like the same is happening here. I forgot the earlier part of this thread, can your (re)post the ifconfig output.
Jim, I also (strongly) recommend to remove the dummy device! Several people talked about problems when you still use it in a real network. It's only there as long as you have a single PC with (modem) net access only.
Ok, I think I've got the problem found. When I do this command: ___________________________ Opus:/root # ipfwadm -Ml IP masquerading entries Opus:/root # -------------------
I get nothing. I believe that I should have something here but do not know what or how to get it where it goes. Can someone help me with this command? BTW I've read the howto I still can't get it going.
That's right as long as you don't have an application running (on a client) that really uses masquerading at the moment i.e.. ftp. It's an dynamic table and only shows entries when they are in use. (BTW. 'rcmasquerade status' should give you the same result) Regards, Michael -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
James (Jim) Hatridge said:
Ok, I think I've got the problem found. When I do this command: ___________________________ Opus:/root # ipfwadm -Ml IP masquerading entries Opus:/root # -------------------
I get nothing. I believe that I should have something here but do not know what or how to get it where it goes. Can someone help me with this command? BTW I've read the howto I still can't get it going.
What are your forwarding rules? I'm using ipchains these days but if I can remember the syntax for ipfwadm I think you can get a list by doing an "ipfwadm -Fl" on opus. If I got that command right and you don't get anything back then you need to tel opus to masquerade stuff from CW with a: ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.17.42/32 Again, that's from memory so if I got it wrong consult the ipfwadm man page. Basically you want to masquerade (which implies forwarding, so you have to use -F on ipfwadm) anything with a source of 192.168.17.42. (anyone else using ipfwadm feel free to jump in here and correct my mistakes) -John -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
Hi John et al, On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, John Grant wrote:
What are your forwarding rules?
This is what it was before I added your command: ------------------------- Opus:/root # ipfwadm -Fl IP firewall forward rules, default policy: accept type prot source destination ports acc/m all localnet/24 anywhere n/a Opus:/root # -----------------------------------------------
I'm using ipchains these days but if I can remember the syntax for ipfwadm I think you can get a list by doing an "ipfwadm -Fl" on opus. If I got that command right and you don't get anything back then you need to tel opus to masquerade stuff from CW with a:
ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.17.42/32
Here it is after doing the above command: -------------------------------- Opus:/root # ipfwadm -Fl IP firewall forward rules, default policy: accept type prot source destination ports acc/m all localnet/24 anywhere n/a acc/m all CW anywhere n/a Opus:/root # ---------------------------------------- But it still does not work. :( What do you think? Shouldn't there be a port number on the line? Thanks for your help! Jim Hatridge hatridge@straubing.baynet.de Proud Linux User #88484 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jim's Beowulf Project Looking for giveaway computers and parts I need it all! Email Jim for details on how you can help build a poor man's super computer. -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
James (Jim) Hatridge said:
Hi John et al,
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, John Grant wrote:
What are your forwarding rules?
This is what it was before I added your command: ------------------------- Opus:/root # ipfwadm -Fl IP firewall forward rules, default policy: accept type prot source destination ports acc/m all localnet/24 anywhere n/a Opus:/root #
This looks ok, assuming "localnet" resolves to "192.168.17.x". If you do a "ipfwadm -Fln" you should see a "192.168.17.0/24" there. The only difference between what I gave you and what you have is that mine is more restrictive. "192.168.17.42/32" means /only/ CW, whereas "192.168.17.0/24" means any computer on net 192.168.17.0 (which would include CW, so you're covered).
-----------------------------------------------
I'm using ipchains these days but if I can remember the syntax for ipfwadm I think you can get a list by doing an "ipfwadm -Fl" on opus. If I got that command right and you don't get anything back then you need to tel opus to masquerade stuff from CW with a:
ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.17.42/32
Here it is after doing the above command: -------------------------------- Opus:/root # ipfwadm -Fl IP firewall forward rules, default policy: accept type prot source destination ports acc/m all localnet/24 anywhere n/a acc/m all CW anywhere n/a Opus:/root # ----------------------------------------
But it still does not work. :( What do you think? Shouldn't there be a port number on the line?
Drat. So much for that idea. The port number should not need to be specified. If you leave it off it defaults to "everything", like the destination. The "n/a" is maybe a bit misleading there. hmmmm.. ok, You say opus has no problems pinging, say yahoo.com, but that if you try to do that on CW it just hangs "looking up yahoo.com", right? If that's the case, what happens if you ping the ip address instead of the name (from CW)? Do a "nslookup yahoo.com" on opus, then use the ip you get back to ping from CW. I get "204.71.200.245" doing the nslookup here, what happens if you do a "ping 204.71.200.245" from CW? IF that works, check that the file /etc/resolv.conf on CW has your nameserver(s) listed in it. It should probably be the same as the one on opus unless you're running your own nameserver (in which case it should point to the box you're running the nameserver on). -John -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
Hi all, On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, John Grant wrote:
James (Jim) Hatridge said:
Hi John et al,
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, John Grant wrote:
What are your forwarding rules?
This is what it was before I added your command: ------------------------- Opus:/root # ipfwadm -Fl IP firewall forward rules, default policy: accept type prot source destination ports acc/m all localnet/24 anywhere n/a Opus:/root #
This looks ok, assuming "localnet" resolves to "192.168.17.x". If you do a "ipfwadm -Fln" you should see a "192.168.17.0/24" there.
---------------------------------------- Opus:/root # ipfwadm -Fln IP firewall forward rules, default policy: accept type prot source destination ports acc/m all 192.168.17.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 n/a Opus:/root # ------------------------------------
The only difference between what I gave you and what you have is that mine is more restrictive. "192.168.17.42/32" means /only/ CW, whereas "192.168.17.0/24" means any computer on net 192.168.17.0 (which would include CW, so you're covered).
I hope to add more systems once I get this done.
-----------------------------------------------
I'm using ipchains these days but if I can remember the syntax for ipfwadm I think you can get a list by doing an "ipfwadm -Fl" on opus. If I got that command right and you don't get anything back then you need to tel opus to masquerade stuff from CW with a:
ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.17.42/32
Here it is after doing the above command: -------------------------------- Opus:/root # ipfwadm -Fl IP firewall forward rules, default policy: accept type prot source destination ports acc/m all localnet/24 anywhere n/a acc/m all CW anywhere n/a Opus:/root # ----------------------------------------
But it still does not work. :( What do you think? Shouldn't there be a port number on the line?
Drat. So much for that idea.
The port number should not need to be specified. If you leave it off it defaults to "everything", like the destination. The "n/a" is maybe a bit misleading there.
hmmmm..
ok, You say opus has no problems pinging, say yahoo.com, but that if you try to do that on CW it just hangs "looking up yahoo.com", right?
Yes and no, when I use lynx or netscrape it hangs with the looking up error. But when I ping I got two differet errors. At first I was getting something like "net not accessable" (I didn't keep the error, sorry) each time it pinged. Then after I messed around with the files some (I've been on this for about 2 weeks now.) I stopped getting anything. I would run ping xxx.xx.xxx.xxx and it would just sit there. When I ^c out of ping it would say something about x packages sent 0 returned 100% lost. I would then do the same ping command on Opus and it worked.
If that's the case, what happens if you ping the ip address instead of the name (from CW)? Do a "nslookup yahoo.com" on opus, then use the ip you get back to ping from CW. I get "204.71.200.245" doing the nslookup here, what happens if you do a "ping 204.71.200.245" from CW?
I'll try to ping yahoo when I get on the net to send this to you. But if the guys in black break down my door as some type of hacker I'll tell them that you said to do it. :)
IF that works, check that the file /etc/resolv.conf on CW has your nameserver(s) listed in it. It should probably be the same as the one on opus unless you're running your own nameserver (in which case it should point to the box you're running the nameserver on).
They are the same, see below. ---------------------------------------- search straubing.baynet.de popmail.straubing.baynet.de smtpmail.straubing.baynet.de nameserver 195.189.80.68 nameserver 195.189.80.62 nameserver 195.189.0.39 --------------------------------- Thanks for you help! Jim Hatridge hatridge@straubing.baynet.de Proud Linux User #88484 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jim's Beowulf Project Looking for giveaway computers and parts I need it all! Email Jim for details on how you can help build a poor man's super computer. -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
"James (Jim) Hatridge" wrote:
---------------------------------------- Opus:/root # ipfwadm -Fln IP firewall forward rules, default policy: accept type prot source destination ports acc/m all 192.168.17.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 n/a ------------------------------------
Yes and no, when I use lynx or netscrape it hangs with the looking up error. But when I ping I got two differet errors. At first I was getting something like "net not accessable" (I didn't keep the error, sorry) each time it pinged. Then after I messed around with the files some (I've been on this for about 2 weeks now.) I stopped getting anything. I would run ping xxx.xx.xxx.xxx and it would just sit there. When I ^c out of ping it would say something about x packages sent 0 returned 100% lost. I would then do the same ping command on Opus and it worked.
Well, this sounds like it is managing to send packets out (or at least it thinks it is) but is not receiving any back. (Hmm. Seems like I'm stating the obvious here...). You're not using any other firewalling package other than your own 'hand roled' ipfwadm rules are you? I'm afraid I've never used ipfwadm before, only ipchains. You would happen to have an input or output rule that could be blocking the ICMP (ping) packets would you? (Assuming you have such a thing with ipfwadm - I don't know). Another thing to check for is whether or not you're running a firewall on the client (non-firewall) box. Oh well. I though I had something useful to say. Hopefully you can find something useful out of all that, Chris -- __ _ -o)/ / (_)__ __ ____ __ Chris Reeves /\\ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / ICQ# 22219005 _\_v __/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, Chris Reeves wrote:
Well, this sounds like it is managing to send packets out (or at least it thinks it is) but is not receiving any back. (Hmm. Seems like I'm stating the obvious here...). You're not using any other firewalling package other than your own 'hand roled' ipfwadm rules are you? I'm afraid I've never used ipfwadm before, only ipchains. You would happen to have an input or output rule that could be blocking the ICMP (ping) packets would you? (Assuming you have such a thing with ipfwadm - I don't know). Another thing to check for is whether or not you're running a firewall on the client (non-firewall) box.
Oh well. I though I had something useful to say. Hopefully you can find something useful out of all that, Chris
Hi Chris, Yes, I had a firewall on CW, but it was turned off. So just to be completely safe I deleted the whole firewall package from CW and rebooted. Still nothing! :( Next idea? TIA Jim Hatridge hatridge@straubing.baynet.de Proud Linux User #88484 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jim's Beowulf Project Looking for giveaway computers and parts I need it all! Email Jim for details on how you can help build a poor man's super computer. -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
James (Jim) Hatridge said:
Hi all,
On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, John Grant wrote:
ok, You say opus has no problems pinging, say yahoo.com, but that if you try to do that on CW it just hangs "looking up yahoo.com", right?
Yes and no, when I use lynx or netscrape it hangs with the looking up error. But when I ping I got two differet errors. At first I was getting something like "net not accessable" (I didn't keep the error, sorry) each time it pinged. Then after I messed around with the files some (I've been on this for about 2 weeks now.) I stopped getting anything. I would run ping xxx.xx.xxx.xxx and it would just sit there. When I ^c out of ping it would say something about x packages sent 0 returned 100% lost. I would then do the same ping command on Opus and it worked.
This sounds like something is eating packets. When you do a ping from CW, can you tell if they ever go out over the ppp link. Can you see any tx/rx lights on the modem, for instance? If you have any lights on the ethernet card(s), check there too. Another thing to check; do you have a dummy0 device on CW? If so, what happens when you do an "ifconfig dummy0 down" on CW and then do the ping thing.
If that's the case, what happens if you ping the ip address instead of the name (from CW)? Do a "nslookup yahoo.com" on opus, then use the ip you get back to ping from CW. I get "204.71.200.245" doing the nslookup here, what happens if you do a "ping 204.71.200.245" from CW?
I'll try to ping yahoo when I get on the net to send this to you. But if the guys in black break down my door as some type of hacker I'll tell them that you said to do it. :)
Do what? ;) -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
Hi John et al, On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, John Grant wrote:
This sounds like something is eating packets.
When you do a ping from CW, can you tell if they ever go out over the ppp link. Can you see any tx/rx lights on the modem, for instance? If you have any lights on the ethernet card(s), check there too.
Sorry, I've an interal modem, no lights. On the ethernet cards, both have two lights, both are on.
Another thing to check; do you have a dummy0 device on CW? If so, what happens when you do an "ifconfig dummy0 down" on CW and then do the ping thing.
I took the dummy0 out before all this. Here is the ifconfig command for CW: --------------------------------------------- CW:/root # ifconfig lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1 RX packets:24 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 TX packets:24 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 eth0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr 00:20:18:57:79:F5 inet addr:192.168.17.42 Bcast:192.168.17.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:4803 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 TX packets:5500 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 Interrupt:9 Base address:0x6000 CW:/root # ------------------------------------ And here it is for Opus: ------------------------------------ Opus:/root # ifconfig lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1 RX packets:286 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 TX packets:286 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 eth0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:05:4C:B7:4C inet addr:192.168.17.41 Bcast:192.168.17.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:10130 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 TX packets:8183 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 Interrupt:10 Base address:0x300 Opus:/root # ----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- CW:/root # route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.17.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 1 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 1 lo 0.0.0.0 192.168.17.41 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 5 eth0 CW:/root #
If that's the case, what happens if you ping the ip address instead of the name (from CW)? Do a "nslookup yahoo.com" on opus, then use the ip you get back to ping from CW. I get "204.71.200.245" doing the nslookup here, what happens if you do a "ping 204.71.200.245" from CW?
I'll try to ping yahoo when I get on the net to send this to you. But if the guys in black break down my door as some type of hacker I'll tell them that you said to do it. :)
I pinged yahoo (and didn't get shot <G>) and this is what I got. I also pinged from Opus and it worked fine. --------------------------------------- CW:/root # ping 204.71.200.245 PING 204.71.200.245 (204.71.200.245): 56 data bytes --- 204.71.200.245 ping statistics --- 11 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss CW:/root # ---------------------------------------- So, what do you guys think? TIA! Jim Hatridge hatridge@straubing.baynet.de Proud Linux User #88484 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jim's Beowulf Project Looking for giveaway computers and parts I need it all! Email Jim for details on how you can help build a poor man's super computer. -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
You need a host route to 192.168.17.41
CW:/root # route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.17.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 1 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 1 lo 0.0.0.0 192.168.17.41 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 5 eth0 CW:/root #
Assuming CW ---(ethernet)---- OPUS ----(PPP dialup)---> Internet On OPUS what does #cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward give you? If it is 0, then you need to enable ip forwarding. Thank you Russell -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
James (Jim) Hatridge said:
Hi John et al,
[snip]
Another thing to check; do you have a dummy0 device on CW? If so, what happens when you do an "ifconfig dummy0 down" on CW and then do the ping thing.
I took the dummy0 out before all this. Here is the ifconfig command for CW: --------------------------------------------- CW:/root # ifconfig lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1 RX packets:24 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 TX packets:24 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
eth0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr 00:20:18:57:79:F5 inet addr:192.168.17.42 Bcast:192.168.17.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:4803 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 TX packets:5500 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 Interrupt:9 Base address:0x6000
CW:/root # ------------------------------------
And here it is for Opus:
------------------------------------ Opus:/root # ifconfig lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1 RX packets:286 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 TX packets:286 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
eth0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:05:4C:B7:4C inet addr:192.168.17.41 Bcast:192.168.17.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:10130 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 TX packets:8183 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 Interrupt:10 Base address:0x300
Opus:/root #
-----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------- CW:/root # route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.17.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 1 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 1 lo 0.0.0.0 192.168.17.41 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 5 eth0 CW:/root # [snip]
So, what do you guys think?
I think I'm out of ideas. I don't know if it'll help at all but here's a dump of my setup here for comparison. It's very similar to yours.. the only difference being that it's a DSL connection rather than a dialup so I use an "eth" device to connect to the modem rather than a "ppp". I have a system called "fess" that corresponds to your opus and one called "furby" that's like your CW. My ISP gave me a static IP of 63.194.251.2 and my ISP's gateway addr is 63.194.251.254, so your ppp0 dev on opus should look like my eth1 on fess when your link is up. With that in mind, here's what my config looks like.. fess:~ # ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:4B:32:ED:47 inet addr:192.168.42.69 Bcast:192.168.42.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 EtherTalk Phase 2 addr:65280/243 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:2604787 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1985236 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:3 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:20:78:16:36:64 inet addr:63.194.251.2 Bcast:63.194.251.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:811 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:743 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 EtherTalk Phase 2 addr:0/0 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1 RX packets:1029713 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1029713 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 fess:~ # route -nv Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 63.194.251.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 192.168.42.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 0.0.0.0 63.194.251.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 ------------------------------------------------------ furby # ifconfig dummy0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet addr:192.168.42.84 Bcast:192.168.42.255 Mask:255.255.255.255 UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:04:77:F1:B0 inet addr:192.168.42.84 Bcast:192.168.42.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 EtherTalk Phase 2 addr:65280/69 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:7150382 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:3533320 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:321 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 EtherTalk Phase 2 addr:0/0 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1 RX packets:4119 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:4119 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 furby # route -nv Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.42.84 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 1 0 0 dummy0 192.168.42.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 0.0.0.0 192.168.42.69 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 -------------------------------------------------------- The only differences that I can see are: 1) I have a dummy0 on furby (surprised me) 2) ifconfig does not show a broadcast addr for my loopback device 3) I have EtherTalk addresses for my internal ether and loopback devs "3" is just because I run netatalk and should not make any difference. I tried getting rid of the dummy dev on furby and it didn't seem to make any difference one way or the other so "1" is probably irrelevant too (despite my superstitions regarding it). I don't know what to make of "2". I'm running a 2.2 kernel, whereas you're running a 2.0. Probably it's just a reporting difference (I don't show the interrupt and io port stuff either). Hope that doesn't confuse the issue. -John -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
Hi all! First of all a big THANKS! to everyone that's helped me with this. It's been a real hair puller. To let you all know what I did,, Opus was set up correctly, the problem was with CW's routeing table. This line was wrong so I deleted it 192.168.17.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 1 eth0 and replaced it with this one. 192.168.17.41 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 1 eth0 Now everything works fine. Thanks again! Jim Hatridge hatridge@straubing.baynet.de Proud Linux User #88484 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jim's Beowulf Project Looking for giveaway computers and parts I need it all! Email Jim for details on how you can help build a poor man's super computer. -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
participants (7)
-
chris.reeves＠iname.com -
hatridge＠straubing.baynet.de -
jmgrant＠primenet.com -
michael＠baypc.co.nz -
philshrimpton＠prometrics.co.uk -
revans＠e-z.net -
tduggan＠dekaresearch.com