On 10/11/2018 03:08, Marc Chamberlin wrote:
Well I am on the opposite of this fence, I use xemacs all the time, my fingers are trained to it and I really like the powerful macro capabilities.. Yes I do wish it had better support but I would vote to keep it... Sigh... sounds like I am getting too old and probably going to miss a favorite tool if it gets dropped....
GNU Emacs is 100% as powerful, has better Unicode support, the same macro language (eLisp) etc. XEmacs is a competing fork of Emacs. It is *not* the X.11 version of Emacs. https://www.xemacs.org/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XEmacs Are you actually using XEmacs, or just normal default GNU Emacs under X? If the latter, you're fine. If the former, I suggest you try GNU Emacs and see. If your macros etc. come across fine, then you will get the benefit of 5+ more years of development, current patches, etc. -- Liam Proven - Technical Writer, SUSE Linux s.r.o. Corso II, Křižíkova 148/34, 186-00 Praha 8 - Karlín, Czechia Email: lproven@suse.com - Office telephone: +420 284 241 084 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org