-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Aaron Kulkis schreef: | Monkey 9 wrote: |> Rajko M. schreef: |>> On Saturday 16 February 2008 10:05:39 am Monkey 9 wrote: |>> |>>>> Which is the goal. Guys that work on debugging are usually very |>>>> fast to |>>>> find duplicates and dismiss false report. Sometimes to fast on former, |>>>> IMHO, but if reporter can provide details they are pretty efficient. |>>>> |>>>> |>>> Ofcourse, only i notice that on many bugreports, there is not going to |>>> be any reaction. |>>> Which rises the question on my side: Why take the effort to make them, |>>> if they are not intended to be fixed? |>>> |>> |>> The bug fixing is not always simple. Developer has to make sure that |>> bugfix will be included upstream, to make sure that is as little |>> differences between openSUSE version and upstream one. Sometimes one |>> has to reiterate question/proposal because developer see software |>> from different prospective than user. Than when is all clear (both |>> reporter and developer talk the same language :-) ) there is their |>> management that has to give approval and also upstream project has to |>> agree. Some developers will take time to give you feedback, so you |>> will know that they work on the bug, others not. They will just work |>> on the bug and for you as reporter it seems that nothing is |>> happening. So far I know there is no rule to give feedback and each |>> developer is handling that in his own way. |>> This is example of simple usability bug and, in my opinion, proper |>> user feedback. No many words, ie. time lost to keep reporter |>> informed, but enough to let me know that bug is in process and my |>> report was not waste of time. |>> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347423 |>> and upstream discussion: |>> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5226 |>> |>> |> Yes it is nice when you notice something is trying to something about it. |> And sometimes very little is nessesary to fix a bug, and sometimes it |> takes longer... |> |> [OT] I installed thunderbrowse in thunderbird, very convenient to |> browse from thunderbird, and go directly to links in same app ;) | | this is why I stayed with the Mozilla suite. | I tried the Thunderbird/Firefox combo, and it was usually | more hassle than it was worth. | | With thunderbrowse, it looks the code is migrating back | to the same place as where Seamonkey is. | | | I started using mozilla in '95. Used netscape, and after the browserwar, i went plain mozilla again, Did many things to make the scale turning in favor of an independant browser, but after netscape went wallstreet, i did not like it so much anymore, and turned again to the original idea and community. - -- Have a nice day, M9. Now, is the only time that exists. ~ OS: Linux 2.6.22.17-0.1-default x86_64 ~ Huidige gebruiker: monkey9@AMD64x2-sfn1 ~ Systeem: openSUSE 10.3 (x86_64) ~ KDE: 3.5.7 "release 72.6" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHuV1ZX5/X5X6LpDgRAvyBAJoDp6IzAHbE+DxtnoYna/cZoDBgqgCbB3wM 82x7VXKBogFQYEKb2YYA2w8= =YL72 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org