Rajko M. wrote:
On Saturday 21 June 2008 09:53:51 pm Raskolnikov Tkachuk wrote: ...
Yes...it's the FIRST version of KDE listed, and not marked with nearly enough warning that it's incomplete, and completely UNLIKE what they might have heard about the KDE that people have been running for years (KDE 3.x).
So what in your parlance: - complete - what is enough marking
"does not have all the functionality of KDE 3.x"
It seems that there is difference what in definitions we use.
Only if you're obtuse, or trying to hide something. Why is SUSE so invested in hiding the demonstrable fact acknowledge by the KDE devs the KDE 4 is supposed to be, but IS NOT YET ready to replace KDE 3.5?
Besides, boys and girls that decide to have Linux are smart enough to understand messages. Insisting on more markings is insult to their intellect.
Not when the markings SUSE wrote are deliberate understatement to the point of being both misleading and dishonest.
You may try to install openSUSE 11.0 and then talk again. I did. DUH!
Are you sure? If you don't see difference between Schneider and Schnieder how you can be sure for 11.0 and 10.1.
Spelling flame. How droll. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org