On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:09:33 +0300
David Robertson
On Sun, 2004-09-26 at 17:55, Trey Sizemore wrote:
I recently added usr-local-bin and suser-jogley to my /et/apt/sources list wanting to install the most recent evolution 2.0. However, I'm getting the following dependency errors when attempting to do so: Just a basic query, but did you run "apt-get update" after editing /etc/apt/sources.list? Many of these files are available in usr-local-bin but you may be getting conflicts - for example, if you also have gnome and suser-gbv in there.
David
I do. My /etc/apt/sources.list is as follows: rpm ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/suse/apt/ SuSE/9.1-i386 security base kde gnome xorg mozilla samba3 ximian suser-rbos suser-guru suser-gbv suser-tcousin suser-sbarnin suser-jogley suser-scorot suser-ollakka funktronics packman packman-i686 kernel-of-the-day wine suse-people suse-projects kde3-stable kde-unstable usr-local-bin rpm-src ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/suse/apt/ SuSE/9.1-i386 security base kde gnome xorg mozilla samba3 ximian suser-rbos suser-guru suser-gbv suser-tcousin suser-sbarnin suser-jogley suser-scorot suser-ollakka funktronics packman packman-i686 kernel-of-the-day wine suse-people suse-projects kde3-stable kde-unstable usr-local-bin Should I remove suser-gbv AND gnome. Will this by itself help (besides going forward) or will I need to remove installed packages from these repositories as well? Thanks. -- Cheers, Trey Surprise due today. Also the rent. Linux salamander 2.6.8-20040917183910-default #1 Fri Sep 17 18:39:10 UTC 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux 11:24am up 20:13, 4 users, load average: 0.25, 0.30, 0.30