-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Wednesday 2006-01-11 at 08:56 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
I've always thought ezmlm to be cumbersome for the end-user. For instance, I tend to receive mailing-list mail on one address and post from another. (all mailing-list mail is fed into a news-server here). ezmlm makes it possible, but it's not exactly straight forward. One major thing about mailman that I find attractive is the webinterface which can be customized and fitted into webpages etc. Very neat.
So I'm curious - why is ezmlm your favourite?
It's the one SuSE uses for these lists, for instance. But I think that at the time the decision was made, mailman was not mature. I read once that first they chose ezmlm (the best, they said - at least then), thus they had to also to use qmail - not the other way round ;-) - -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFDxPgotTMYHG2NR9URAmE/AJ91EjoET2TDLd1cluX6J9cmMt+19ACglp7P NmeoFpLYwee89ZNUup5zay4= =hI0M -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----