Am Sonntag, 12. April 2009 19:01:26 schrieb peter nikolic:
On Sunday 12 April 2009, Sven Burmeister wrote:
Am Sonntag, 12. April 2009 16:14:28 schrieb jdd:
Sven Burmeister a écrit :
Same old, same old...
That statement is about as much use as a chocolate teapot in a transport cafe' it is all very well being sarcastic when you cant be bothered to give a decent answer but it solves NOTHING AT ALL ... Period .
I see, resurrecting the discussion for the one thousand and first time is going to be of use then because people will add new views and facts instead of repeating what they have already stated in detail a few weeks/months ago.
If you intend to release 11.2 with NO KDE.3.5 then you have got to ensure that it has ALL the functions that are wanted/needed that includes ALL Packages and softwares that are in KDE 3.5.x and i do mean ALL packages anything less is COMPLETELY unacceptable , you know it, i know it, we all know it yet you still continue to do absolutely nothing except give people a hard time just because they voice a very GENUINE and to the point thing .
I think even those who strongly argue in favour of KDE3 would not sign that. I'm too lazy to do some research so call me wrong on this, but I would bet there are lots and lots of applications and projects that remove features while adding others over time which would be forbidden if I'd take your statement above seriously. There are even KDE applications that got discontinued after KDE3 development ended. I guess openSUSE should replace their developers and bring back kaboodle and noatun, as an example, because all packages means all packages, does it not? You highlighted it by capital letters which might be seen as "shouting", so you really must have meant it. I might be wrong though - maybe. BTW I want/need the moon on a stick. But anyway, thanks for making your attitude and way of argumentation that obvious. The sad thing though is that I have not read a single argument in your statement but just "Packages and softwares that are in KDE 3.5.x and i do mean ALL packages anything less is COMPLETELY unacceptable , you know it, i know it, we all know it [...]". So we all know it but some work against their own knowledge because it makes them happy to do something although they know it's wrong? Sounds like a conspirancy to me. Due to the lack of arguments I could not answer to any of them, which is not too bad since most of that conversation would be in the archives already anyway. I just hope you did not expect answers to arguments like "you know it, i know it, we all know it ".
I know you dont like me i in fact you dont like anyone that does not tow your line thats your perogative but in actual fact could not give a monkeys toss about that BUT it is time you started taking notice and STOPPED BEING such a condescending person .
You should not draw conclusions about others based on yourself. Sven -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org