On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 2:11 PM, MikeDL
From what I've read, because KDE 4 uses a number of video features and modes that KDE 3 did not. Due to lack of heavy use, these features were broken or slow in several drivers (including ATI and NVIDIA) when KDE 4 came out; the situation is much improved today, at least for NVIDIA.
So were these known problems? If so, then the bashing is appropriate.
Nope. But the KDE 3 dead-enders are very vocal.
Yep.
After the last several months with KDE 4.1 & 4.2, I hate living with the KDE 3 limitations on the systems I'm not ready to upgrade.
And I can't stand using KDE4 for more than 10 minutes because I can't figure out what I am doing. However, I'm not calling the KDE4 guys names, and I really think the name calling needs to stop(not so much saying that you are, but a lot of others have been). Linux is about CHOICE. I don't care for KDE4 so I can CHOOSE to use KDE3. You have the opposite opinion. Let's just agree to disagree. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org