On Wednesday 31 May 2006 02:55, Bryan S. Tyson wrote:
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 01:48 pm, suse@rio.vg wrote:
What is SuSE doing? What are you guys thinking? What's the rationale behind all these changes?
I started with SuSE at version 6.
I started with 5.3
I used to call SuSE "the Cadillac of Linux distributions."
That's nice.
Those days are over. We have to face the fact that the SuSE we once knew is gone. Remember all the speculation and arguing about what would happen to SuSE when Novell took over? We are seeing the sad answer.
Hmm, you see things black/white while in reality things are more complicated.
Take for example the separation of GPL'ed/non-GPL'ed packages. Today I've
read it was more or less dictated from the kernel devs (See "Re: [SLE] And
another 10.1 showstopper", From: Ken Schneider