Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 04:21:08PM +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2012-05-24 08:02, Per Jessen wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
Well, specific oS question: why don't we drop libre office and go back to A OO?
Is there a reason why we shouldn't offer both? We also offer mysql and mariadb, syslog-ng and rsyslog etc etc.
In the case of *sql, I see confusion, I don't know what to use. In the case of A-OO vs LO, I see division of labor. I don't really see the advantage.
We're talking about projects that have branched - remember gcc and egcs? We don't know which branch is likely to live or be the strongest, so we include both in the distro. Same for mysql and mariadb. Which one to use is up to you.
Well, SUSE has lots of the Libreoffice developers on staff, and in their opinion (check Michael Meeks blog entries;) LibreOffice is the stronger one.
That is my impression too, but like David Rankin, I have also noticed several small formatting issues when moving from OO to LO. That is very annoying for old documents. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (23.8°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org