* Carlos E. R.
On 2023-02-04 03:41, Larry Len Rainey wrote:
Is this OK? I took option 4 to get the 500+ updates
# zypper ref ; zypper dup --allow-vendor-change Repository 'Packman Tumbleweed Repository' is up to date. Repository 'openSUSE-Tumbleweed-Repository (DEBUG)' is up to date. Repository 'openSUSE-Tumbleweed-Non-Oss' is up to date. Repository 'openSUSE-Tumbleweed-Oss' is up to date. Repository 'openSUSE-Tumbleweed-Repository (Sources)' is up to date. Repository 'openSUSE-Tumbleweed-Update' is up to date. Repository 'TeamViewer - x86_64' is up to date. All repositories have been refreshed. Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... Warning: You are about to do a distribution upgrade with all enabled repositories. Make sure these repositories are compatible before you continue. See 'man zypper' for more information about this command. Computing distribution upgrade...
Problem: the to be installed libopenssl-devel-3.0.7-1.1.noarch requires 'libopenssl-3-devel = 3.0.7', but this requirement cannot be provided not installable providers: libopenssl-3-devel-3.0.7-3.1.i586[repo-oss] libopenssl-3-devel-3.0.7-3.1.x86_64[repo-oss]
You probably should report this as a bug.
more probably hasn't arrived at the particular mirrors used. I see this somewhat frequently.
Solution 1: deinstallation of libopenssl-1_1-devel-1.1.1s-2.1.x86_64 Solution 2: deinstallation of libopenssl-devel-1.1.1s-1.1.noarch Solution 3: keep obsolete libopenssl-devel-1.1.1s-1.1.noarch Solution 4: break libopenssl-devel-3.0.7-1.1.noarch by ignoring some of its dependencies
I'd do "2", it is a devel package.
*only* if not needed for local compiling. it was probably installed for a reason and therefore necessary. "3" would be most appropriate. -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/piwigo paka @ IRCnet oftc