On 17.12.2010 15:02, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 14:55 +0100, Kim Leyendecker wrote:
On 17.12.2010 13:34, Stephan Kleine wrote:
On 16/12/10 19:21, jdd wrote:
so, keep 11.4 for this time, then go to 12, 13.... This was exactly my idea when previous conversation happened. For me it is the best option. Why? a) we don't need to change the way of our next release marketing (11.4) b) we don't have to discuss if some future version is worth bumping major version or just minor version, ever! c) we don't use date in version, so we can afford slipping the release if we really need to and don't ship broken releases like Ubuntu does +1000. Best stuff I read on the whole codename, release numbering, .... on
On Friday December 17 2010 13:20:33 Pavol Rusnak wrote: this list ever. regards, Stephan +1001 Maybe we can make 12.0 as a really new release that brings some revolutionary new. I thought it was just "12" and not "12.0" ;)
I don't care how the version numbers are assigned - openSUSE w/GNOME rocks, I [and our department] use it five to six days a week eight or more hours a day. Stable, productive, and just a little bit awesome.
Yes, it rocks. I know. We know. I think everybody knows ;) But when we talking on version numbers, we should think of the major.minor.release scheme. A release scheme like Ubuntu will bring some issues when it's time for a bugfix release (e.g. 11.4.1). Maybe we will do 11.4 as 11.4. Then we wait till GNOME 3. I think a desktop environment is an important thing for a Linux distribution. a first version of GNOME 3 we bring with 11.5. When GNOME3 is stable enough (I hope it don't take so much time like KDE 4) we release 12.0 or 12 with a stable GNOME 3 and KDE 4.x or maybe KDE 5. kind regards kdl -- Kim Leyendecker (kimleyendecker@hotmail.de) Kernel 2.4.37.10-kdl Maintainer Powered by openSUSE 11.2 "Emerald" GNOME This mail was composed under Linux -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org