https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/152413 has been summarily closed. Rather than limiting follow-up to the few who ever address or have interest in progress.opensuse.org issues, I thought it better to comment to a larger openSUSE audience. You may open the above link to see the initial report and "closing" (about 1600 characters). What follows is the further comment I originally intended to make there: I'll cede some power might be in short supply, but you admins have all the decision power you need. You chose the site software. You installed it. As the site maintainers, you can revert the ostensible "upgrade", revert to the software used previously, or install other software, such as the user-friendly software used by https://www.linuxquestions.org/. I did none of those things. I'm not a discourse user or admin. I'm a website user. The forum admins are the discourse users. The admins chose it. The admins installed it. The admins maintain it. They should be taking it up with upstream if they can't figure out how to solve the problem themselves. Partaking in openSUSE user assistance via email is what the mailing lists are for. What exactly are these so-called "security updates" that necessitate shutting out users of multiple web browsers? Were there any issues that applied generally, such as to include forums.opensuse.org, or were they limited in applicability, thus not forums.opensuse.org? Were there not release notes for the update that warned multiple web browsers would no longer be "supported", even though "web browsers" are not what websites are supposed to support, but user agent functionality? The concept of "web browser" support has been broken from day one. W3 instructs it's function to sniff for if sniffing is necessary, which itself should be limited. -- Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion, based on faith, not based on science. Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata