On Tuesday 09 October 2007 09:22:24 wrote Pascal Bleser:
Adrian Schröter wrote: ..
Quite a number of users have commented on this behaviour, I have experienced it myself with 2 installs already. It has also been mentioned in some reviews, contributing to overall bad reviews of 10.3.
Do you you have URLs ?
Lots, seriously. Gut feeling is that currently, there are even more bad reviews about 10.3 than 10.2 (which is quite surprising, given that 10.3 definitely hasn't got the package management issues 10.2 had).
I think we should collect URLs to bad reviews somewhere (on the wiki ?) and comment them there, to try to identify what the most annoying problems were -- and whether it's just motivated by the usual "anti-Novell-because-it's-in-bed-with-MS" FUD from so-called journalists or whether they actually have a point. To me, many of the reviews are motivated by the hatred against Novell and you can feel the tone right from the start, they're just looking for things to criticize, but even in those, they may have a point with 2 or 3 things.
Shall we discuss this on -project ? (already answered, I'm cross-posting)
Oh, and getting rid of compiz would probably remove 50% of the problems people have with openSUSE 10.3 but.. ok, let's keep that for -project :)
IMHO, the best thing would be to collect the (reasonable) rants/problems on a wiki page with an additional link to the review. So we can easily see on the wiki page where we do have problems. Additional bugzilla entries might needed as well, depending on the problem. -- Adrian Schroeter SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) email: adrian@suse.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org