Hi,
currently we have an inconsistency with naming debuginfo packages
for multilib packages (-32bit, -64bit).
Packages that build multilibs themselves like gcc produce for example
libgcc_s1-32bit to which then rpm appends -debuginfo to form
libgcc_s1-32bit-debuginfo. This is upstream rpm behavior.
Now we have another way of producing multilib packages, namely via
the baselibs.conf machinery which has a default rule to produce
libgcc_s1-debuginfo-32bit.
This is inconsistent and results in gdb making invalid suggestions
about debuginfo packages to install (it suggests glibc-32bit-debuginfo
instead of glibc-debuginfo-32bit).
The proposal is to fix the SUSE specific baselibs.conf script to
instead produce X-32bit-debuginfo from X-debuginfo.
If there are no objections to this plan we'll go forward with this.
Richard.
--
Richard Biener