Hello, Am Mittwoch, 8. Februar 2017, 13:29:28 CET schrieb Richard Biener:

currently we have an inconsistency with naming debuginfo packages for multilib packages (-32bit, -64bit).

Packages that build multilibs themselves like gcc produce for example libgcc_s1-32bit to which then rpm appends -debuginfo to form libgcc_s1-32bit-debuginfo. This is upstream rpm behavior.

Now we have another way of producing multilib packages, namely via the baselibs.conf machinery which has a default rule to produce libgcc_s1-debuginfo-32bit.

This is inconsistent and results in gdb making invalid suggestions about debuginfo packages to install (it suggests glibc-32bit-debuginfo instead of glibc-debuginfo-32bit).

The proposal is to fix the SUSE specific baselibs.conf script to instead produce X-32bit-debuginfo from X-debuginfo.

Sounds like a good idea ;-) Please make sure to add an Obsoletes: to make sure the debuginfo packages with the "wrong" name get uninstalled. Regards, Christian Boltz -- [~/.gtkrc] Brauche ich für Mozilla Firebird, sonst macht der "Faustgroße Killerschriften greifen an!" in Formularen. [Ratti in suse-linux] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org