August 2022 - openSUSE Kubic Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1202067] MicroOS Desktop: unacceptable TLS certificate
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 10 Aug '22

10 Aug '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202067 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202067#c16 David Diaz <dgonzalez(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(yast2-maintainers |needinfo?(rbrown(a)suse.com) |(a)suse.de) | --- Comment #16 from David Diaz <dgonzalez(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Jan Zerebecki from comment #13) > I don't think anyone reachable via microos-bugs knows enough about yast or > the skelcd control file. CC-ing the relevant bugowner instead: > > osc bugowner -A yast2-caasp > Defined in project: YaST:Head > bugowner of yast2-caasp : > yast2-maintainers > > osc bugowner -A skelcd-control-MicroOS > Defined in project: YaST:Head > bugowner of skelcd-control-MicroOS : > yast2-maintainers Probably by accident because of the module name. Asking Richard Brown, who created and updated the skelcd. See output from git blame https://github.com/yast/skelcd-control-MicroOS/blame/509289c27796cbbdaa7cbf… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1202287] Cannot add a printer in CUPS on MicroOS
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 10 Aug '22

10 Aug '22

1 0

[Bug 1202290] Unable to update system using GNOME Software in MicroOS Desktop
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 10 Aug '22

10 Aug '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202290 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202290#c2 --- Comment #2 from Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Jonathan Kang from comment #1) > Created attachment 860723 [details] > Failed offline update in GNOME Software It doesn't make any sense to use "GNOME offline update", since transactional-update is doing an offline update itself in a much better and more robust way. No idea if this GNOME functionality can be disabled in the MicroOS Gnome Desktop, but should be. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1202287] New: Cannot add a printer in CUPS
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 10 Aug '22

10 Aug '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1202287 Bug ID: 1202287 Summary: Cannot add a printer in CUPS Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: All OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: MicroOS Assignee: kubic-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: caleb(a)candj.us QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:103.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/103.0 Build Identifier: CUPS appears to be unusable on MicroOS Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Install cups and associated packages with transactional-update, reboot 2.Allow remote access to web interface by editing the config 3.enable and start cups service 4.From web interface try to add printer or find printer 5.Receive error: Request Entity Too Large -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1202067] MicroOS Desktop: unacceptable TLS certificate
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 09 Aug '22

09 Aug '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202067 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202067#c15 Axel Braun <axel.braun(a)gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(axel.braun(a)gmx.de | |) | --- Comment #15 from Axel Braun <axel.braun(a)gmx.de> --- (In reply to Thorsten Kukuk from comment #14) > (In reply to Jan Zerebecki from comment #13) > > I don't think anyone reachable via microos-bugs knows enough about yast or > > the skelcd control file. CC-ing the relevant bugowner instead: > > That's per se not a YaST problem, but it looks like the MicroOS Desktop > system role was choosen? Axel, would be nice if you would explain what you > did install and not let others guess or make wrong assumptions. Because it > looks like this is not "MicroOs" as you claims but "MicroOS Desktop"? Thats right, as the headline says, I have chosen MicroOS Desktop for installation. As the Raspi does not have a Real-time-Clock, its date and time settings are inaccurate unless it gets a date/time from NTP...but that is not active by default > Richard, who is responsible for the GNOME Desktop case to setup the time > correct? > > (In reply to Axel Braun from comment #5) > > Problem is that MicroOS comes w/o YaST, and by this w/o save_y2logs as well. > > How to proceed? > > This is not correct or a bug in the Desktop selection, MicroOS comes with > save_y2logs. It's an extra package for that reason. ..but it is not installed by default.... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1202067] MicroOS Desktop: unacceptable TLS certificate
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 09 Aug '22

09 Aug '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202067 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202067#c14 Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rbrown(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(axel.braun(a)gmx.de | |) --- Comment #14 from Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Jan Zerebecki from comment #13) > I don't think anyone reachable via microos-bugs knows enough about yast or > the skelcd control file. CC-ing the relevant bugowner instead: That's per se not a YaST problem, but it looks like the MicroOS Desktop system role was choosen? Axel, would be nice if you would explain what you did install and not let others guess or make wrong assumptions. Because it looks like this is not "MicroOs" as you claims but "MicroOS Desktop"? Richard, who is responsible for the GNOME Desktop case to setup the time correct? (In reply to Axel Braun from comment #5) > Problem is that MicroOS comes w/o YaST, and by this w/o save_y2logs as well. > How to proceed? This is not correct or a bug in the Desktop selection, MicroOS comes with save_y2logs. It's an extra package for that reason. Richard? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1202067] MicroOS Desktop: unacceptable TLS certificate
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 09 Aug '22

09 Aug '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202067 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202067#c13 Jan Zerebecki <jzerebecki(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jzerebecki(a)suse.com, | |yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de Flags|needinfo?(microos-bugs@suse |needinfo?(yast2-maintainers |.de) |(a)suse.de) --- Comment #13 from Jan Zerebecki <jzerebecki(a)suse.com> --- I don't think anyone reachable via microos-bugs knows enough about yast or the skelcd control file. CC-ing the relevant bugowner instead: > osc bugowner -A yast2-caasp Defined in project: YaST:Head bugowner of yast2-caasp : yast2-maintainers > osc bugowner -A skelcd-control-MicroOS Defined in project: YaST:Head bugowner of skelcd-control-MicroOS : yast2-maintainers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1202000] [Build 20220729] openQA test fails in transactional_update: read-only file system
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Aug '22

05 Aug '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202000 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202000#c3 Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #2) > Not sure what to do about this. Make the ordering dependency more extreme by > having boot-writable.mount Requires=systemd-mount-fs.service? Next try, closer to the root cause which is systemd-remount-fs.service: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/993307 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1202000] [Build 20220729] openQA test fails in transactional_update: read-only file system
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Aug '22

05 Aug '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202000 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202000#c2 Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #2 from Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> --- Didn't help, openQA is still unhappy. The journal shows: Aug 05 05:37:34.280907 susetest systemd[1]: Starting Remount Root and Kernel File Systems... ... Aug 05 05:37:34.281179 susetest systemd[1]: systemd-remount-fs.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE Aug 05 05:37:34.281193 susetest systemd[1]: systemd-remount-fs.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. Aug 05 05:37:34.281207 susetest systemd[1]: Failed to start Remount Root and Kernel File Systems. ... Aug 05 05:37:34.247313 susetest systemd-remount-fs[444]: /usr/bin/mount for / exited with exit status 32. Aug 05 05:37:34.282334 susetest apparmor.systemd[435]: Restarting AppArmor Aug 05 05:37:34.282334 susetest apparmor.systemd[435]: Reloading AppArmor profiles Aug 05 05:37:34.283671 susetest systemd-remount-fs[448]: mount: /: mount point is busy. ... Aug 05 05:37:34.984770 susetest systemd[1]: Mounting /boot/writable... ... Aug 05 05:37:35.246908 susetest systemd[1]: Mounted /boot/writable. ... Aug 05 05:37:35.331954 susetest systemd[1]: Starting Remount Root and Kernel File Systems... ... Aug 05 05:37:35.500468 susetest systemd[1]: Finished Remount Root and Kernel File Systems. The first attempt to systemd-remount-fs.service fails because something has a file opened in RW mode, so it's attempted again later, when it's already too late. Not sure what to do about this. Make the ordering dependency more extreme by having boot-writable.mount Requires=systemd-mount-fs.service? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1202067] MicroOS Desktop: unacceptable TLS certificate
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Aug '22

05 Aug '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202067 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202067#c12 --- Comment #12 from David Diaz <dgonzalez(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Knut Alejandro Anderssen Gonz�lez from comment #9) > > The desktop role executes the gnome-initial-setup for configuring the > timezone. See comment #10 and comment #11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0