On 2015-11-06 13:56, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
Why does it have to be a LEAP based one? What is worse in that minimal CD produced every couple days in the Tumbleweed setup? You get a more recent set of tools, that should still be able to manage your older install, you get regular bug fixes, you have a more modern kernel, thus unlike with an older release, you do not lose hardware support.
A more modern kernel and tools is a problem in a rescue system. They should be the same version as on the system been rescued. Why? Example: you could format a filesystem with features that Leap would not understand.
People: please stop ASKING for stuff to be done FOR you: STEP up and DO the stuff - asking is easy and volunteering other people's time as well.
Ok. Would you volunteer to train us on how to do it? -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" at Telcontar)