Hi,
I think TW repos are there 'by default' for now but should not actually be used.
Repos for 42.1 should be in the works.
For now testing should focus only on what's available in the disk image.
rgds
Paul
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Takashi Iwai
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 21:34:41 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
We still have issues, but we have a first build for Leap hopefully resulting into a first milestone this week.
Have a look at the tests and/or download the ISO from openQA and provide fixes and missing packages to openSUSE:42:
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/overview?distri=opensuse&version=42&groupid=7
Some errors of aplay test seems triggered by the difference of ncurses between SLE12 and Tumbleweed. For example, if I install 42 and try to upgrade alsa-utils.rpm from repo-oss, it gives the same error. (I tried to install 42 even on a bare metal! :)
This made me wonder whether the repo setup (using Tumbleweed as an update) is correct. Is it?
In anyway, all ALSA-related packages I've been maintaining (alsa, alsa-utils, alsa-firmware, alsa-plugins, alsa-tools) can be taken from Tumbleweed safely. They must be backward compatible.
About the sound related stuff, also pulseaudio is a thing that can be taken from FACTORY fairly safely. The recent PA package just follows the upstream development, and the upstream became much saner than in the past a few years ago.
How can one handle such requests?
thanks,
Takashi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org