On Saturday 03 March 2007 15:22:21 Rajko M. wrote:
On Saturday 03 March 2007 09:02, Alberto Passalacqua wrote:
I'm a bit critical about the _one_day_ bug testing because I think it's too short to examine the bugs of something complex like a distribution.
...
I personally prefer shorter meetings in multiple days than 24 hours meeting where everyone has to wait for the moment which interests him. But of course this is an opinion.
While IRC meetings are cooncentrated they exclude all people that are not in right time zone. With present number of active users that is not good. I would prefer one thread on this list that will announce start of triage and than separate threads for each bug.
That's an argument against a meeting _time_, but not really against a meeting day. If it's a bug triage weekend (or any given couple of days), then different people can be on at different times. And particularly on a weekend, people's sleeping patterns vary quite a bit, so I don't think it's a problem. Like I said though anyway, this is a tried, tested and proven method: many other projects have these, and they work tremendously well. Kind thoughts, -- Francis Giannaros Website: http://francis.giannaros.org IRC: apokryphos on irc.freenode.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org