On 5 November 2015 at 15:03, Carlos E. R.
On 2015-11-05 14:49, Yamaban wrote:
On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 14:35, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar
wrote: On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 13:53 +0100, Yamaban wrote:
IMHO, lets wait for, say 2 to 4 weeks, integrate all until then accumulated patches, and then build a "Rescue" and "Live" media.
Interesting mail - are you volunteering somebody else's time to actually DO the work or will you be doing it?
Question: TW has those ISO; I hope they are created more or less automatically. Can't the same be done on Leap? I ask, I don't know
No Production is one thing, testing, maintaining, and fixing bugs for the lifecycle of a distribution is another thing Production is easy and can be automated Maintaining is hard and cannot be automated Fixing bugs is extra hard and requires similar hardware to reproduce hardware specific issues If people step up to do the work for Leap 42.1 32-bit, fine, but they didn't during the development of Leap, and I see no signs of that changing. It's a dying architecture, it's time to think about moving on. TW's 32-bit images have now been reduced from being tested on par with 64-bit to barely being tested at all (less than ppc64le or aarch64, two architectures where we have people contributing to the production and maintenance of those architectures). I'm pretty sure it wont be that long before we'll be having a discussion about the removal of TW 32-bit also - but at this very moment, it's less work to keep it going on 'autopilot' than removing it - We're probably only one major 32-bit architecture specific bug away though from having to make a serious decision about whether it's feasible to continue support though. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org