Am 14.06.2012 12:19, schrieb Stephan Kulow:
To me the main reason to go there is that *other* people actually can verify their work is good and that factory is usable and testable. If that means we won't get new automake or new gcc soonish, I can accept it. If someone really wanted either, they would know where to find it and fix the problems.
But OTOH this might punish e.g. gcc for no good reason. Example: the "zypper fails with gcc47" mess. Everyone blamed gcc47, but after looking at the valgrind output, it looked to my untrained eye as if the zypper code was the one to blame. But should the gcc guys have to fix others crap just because they now trigger the broken code to actually break? I have no answer for that. -- Stefan Seyfried "Dispatch war rocket Ajax to bring back his body!" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org To contact the owner, e-mail: email@example.com