2012/2/10 Kai-Uwe Behrmann
Am 10.02.12, 18:40 -0000 schrieb Nelson Marques:
up for maintaining a piece of software... but wouldn't it be more useful if you implemented your software directly on GNOME or KDE
That path is still open. But dropping the only available solution before something else is in place is not nice IMHO. Linux is already years behind osX in regard to that very topic.
There's one big difference, OSX is DRM/DRI friendly, free software isn't.
I know compiz is probably be around for a few years more (ex: on commercial Linux), for example my home laptop has a RHEL 6.2 with GNOME2 and Compiz, but it's really being abandoned in determent of newer DE's.
Btw. I do not think that Compiz package maintainance is such a burden. Most work on compiz-0.8.8 was already present in obs provided by others.
I did maintained it for a bit in G:Ayatana (0.9.2), and it isn't really pie... Dimstar most likely shares the same thought... Compiz in 0.9.x branch is very volatile... dunno about 0.8.x. NM
Either way, I happy someone jumped in to keep compiz alive.
Glad you like it.
kind regards Kai-Uwe
2012/2/10 Kai-Uwe Behrmann
: Quoting Kai-Uwe Behrmann
: Integration of ICC support into KWin and GNOME shell is of course prefered.
CompICC is currently the _only_ code for whole screen ICC colour correction on Linux.
-- Nelson Marques /* http://www.marques.so nmo.marques@gmail.com */ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org