Petr Cerny wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
There are better filesystems out there (ok, each is better then others in one benchmark ;)
Disregarding benchmarks, what is generally considered a better filesystem when the requirements are 1) terabyte size 2) 365x24 uptime, 3) LVM use and 4) millions of small files ?
I would go for XFS - but again, this is a matter of religion... ;)
Best regards Petr
I shall give that a try next time I do a new build, see how it squares off against ext3. I regard resilience ahead of performance as that's the one that can bite most painfully, but there is no reason not to have both. Regards Sid. -- Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private Pilot Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers Tech Support Specialist, Cricket Coach Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all Computing Tasks --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org