Carlos E. R. [15.07.2015 14:12]:
On 2015-07-15 13:57, Lars Müller wrote:
So what's the difference if we would keep flash-player in the default installation and the browser in use again decides by good reason to disable it due to yet another security issue?
But it is not disabled. You just get a very prominent button on the top to enable it, with a warning.
When I get a button that allows me to enable some piece of software, in which state ist this software? Is it not disabled?
Right. With the same argumentation it's possible to stress how important it is to kick flash-player out.
You have to convince the content providers, not users.
As I said elsewhere, all major tv providers in my country use flash with no alternative. Well, yes, an applet in a tablet. One at least uses silverlight instead. Even google uses flash on some commercials.
OK, so for spanish customers, flash has to be enabled.
As long as these people use flash, not providing flash will push users to Windows, and IE if need be.
Cool. Did you ever consider to earn money for your prophecies? --