Jan Engelhardt wrote:
The only difference is that, IIRC, unlike Windows, we enable antialiasing below 15pt as well and thus ignore the embedded bitmaps. That is a subjective choice, and I happen to support it.
It's also a per-font-dependent choice based on whether or not the font has good embedded bitmaps. I've seen similar comments about some fonts having not-so-great interpreter code for non-bitmap fonts. It might be useful to start collecting feedback about what fonts look good at what resolutions using what display method. Given enough data, better autoconfiguration could be built (possibly based on the users DPI, and individual preferences. Even a font-tuning facility like the clear-type tuning facility would go a long way toward users being able to enter "preferences" for specific fonts -- that, *hopefully*, could be uploaded back to suse for generic-overall processing to feed into defaults for those who don't run those, or for new font choices?... maybe pie-in-the-sky, but data collection for such -- even if only used locally seems like an important first step.
Experiment what you like best.
That's hard when you can't see them side-by-side or in an a-b comparison (a flip -- is this better, or (flip), is this better)? That said, is there a way to display a text popup window where you can also specific alternate rendering methods from the system defaults? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org