https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466424 User hmacht@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466424#c1 Holger Macht changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Holger Macht 2009-01-19 02:20:24 MST --- The HAL specification contains for the SetCPUFReqPerformance method: "Sets the performance of the dynamic scaling mechanism. This method summarizes and abstracts all the different settings which can be taken for dynamic frequency adjustments, like at which load to switch up frequency or how many steps the mechanism should traverse until reaching the maximum frequency. The higher the value, the more performance you get. Respectively, the higher the value, the sooner and the more often the frequency is switched up." So this doesn't necessarily mean that setting a performance of 52 gives you an up threshold of 52. It rather calculates the up_threshold based on the performance given. It also sais, "the higher the value, the more performance"...., and this wouldn't be true for the up_threshold kernel value. I'm really sorry, but I have to close this bug as INVALID. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.