https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466424
User hmacht@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466424#c1
Holger Macht changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Holger Macht 2009-01-19 02:20:24 MST ---
The HAL specification contains for the SetCPUFReqPerformance method:
"Sets the performance of the dynamic scaling mechanism. This method summarizes
and abstracts all the different settings which can be taken for dynamic
frequency adjustments, like at which load to switch up frequency or how many
steps the mechanism should traverse until reaching the maximum frequency. The
higher the value, the more performance you get. Respectively, the higher the
value, the sooner and the more often the frequency is switched up."
So this doesn't necessarily mean that setting a performance of 52 gives you an
up threshold of 52. It rather calculates the up_threshold based on the
performance given. It also sais, "the higher the value, the more
performance"...., and this wouldn't be true for the up_threshold kernel value.
I'm really sorry, but I have to close this bug as INVALID.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.