[Bug 1201725] New: [Build 6.199] openQA test fails in rename10: exfat returns EINVAL instead of ENAMETOOLONG
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725 Bug ID: 1201725 Summary: [Build 6.199] openQA test fails in rename10: exfat returns EINVAL instead of ENAMETOOLONG Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.4 Hardware: Other URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/2474113/modules/rena me10/steps/6 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs@opensuse.org Reporter: fvogt@suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs@suse.de CC: chrubis@suse.com, petr.vorel@suse.com Found By: openQA Blocker: No The LTP rename10 test fails: tst_test.c:1599: TINFO: Testing on exfat tst_test.c:1065: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with exfat opts='' extra opts='' rename10.c:32: TFAIL: rename(TEMP_FILE, long_path) expected ENAMETOOLONG: EINVAL (22) ## Observation openQA test in scenario opensuse-15.4-JeOS-for-AArch64-aarch64-jeos-ltp-syscalls@USBboot_aarch64 fails in [rename10](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/2474113/modules/rename10/steps/6) ## Test suite description ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [6.178](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/2417475) ## Expected result Last good: [6.176](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/2416374) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=aarch64&distri=opensuse&flavor=JeOS-for-AArch64&machine=USBboot_aarch64&test=jeos-ltp-syscalls&version=15.4) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725#c1
Takashi Iwai
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725#c2
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Vogt
Does the test fail only with SLE15-SP4 kernel, and no problem with TW kernel?
TW works: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/2474777#step/rename10/6 FWICT, yes. I also just noticed that it only fails on aarch64, not x86_64, but that seems to be because x86_64 uses kernel-default-base, which presumably triggers a fallback to FUSE exfat: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/2476389#step/rename10/6 tst_test.c:1599: TINFO: Testing on exfat tst_test.c:1065: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with exfat opts='' extra opts='' tst_test.c:1079: TINFO: Trying FUSE... FUSE exfat 1.3.0 rename10.c:32: TPASS: rename(TEMP_FILE, long_path) : ENAMETOOLONG (36) While the failing aarch64 one doesn't: tst_test.c:1599: TINFO: Testing on exfat tst_test.c:1065: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with exfat opts='' extra opts='' rename10.c:32: TFAIL: rename(TEMP_FILE, long_path) expected ENAMETOOLONG: EINVAL (22) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725#c3
--- Comment #3 from Takashi Iwai
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725#c4
--- Comment #4 from Takashi Iwai
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725#c5
--- Comment #5 from Takashi Iwai
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725#c6
--- Comment #6 from Takashi Iwai
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725#c7
--- Comment #7 from Takashi Iwai
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725#c8
--- Comment #8 from Takashi Iwai
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725#c9
Takashi Iwai
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725#c10
--- Comment #10 from Goldwyn Rodrigues
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725#c11
--- Comment #11 from Takashi Iwai
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725#c12
--- Comment #12 from Takashi Iwai
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
Takashi Iwai
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725#c13
Takashi Iwai
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725#c16
--- Comment #16 from Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725#c19
--- Comment #19 from Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725#c24
--- Comment #24 from Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725#c25
--- Comment #25 from Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725#c26
--- Comment #26 from Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725#c35
--- Comment #35 from Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725#c36
--- Comment #36 from Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201725#c37
--- Comment #37 from Swamp Workflow Management
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@suse.com