- openSUSE Bugs

[Bug 195623] Returning to GUI via <ctrl><alt><F7> invalid video frequency on Intel integrated graphics
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 08 Oct '06

08 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195623 sndirsch(a)novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|LATER | ------- Comment #13 from sndirsch(a)novell.com 2006-10-08 06:22 MST ------- From: Joseph Lord <joseph(a)lordweb.net> To: sndirsch(a)novell.com Subject: Can you reopen Bug 195623 please? Now fixed in X.org - bug 5795 Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 00:43:37 +0100 Hi, I've noticed that this issue has now been fixed in X.org, and I was hoping that you could reopen it. It is currently set to later but it would be great if you could offer the fix as an update for Suse 10.1. The bug report in the project bug database. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5795 Thanks, Joseph Lord -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 206533] New: mod_php5 SIGCHLD handler breaks subversion hooks
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 08 Oct '06

08 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206533 Summary: mod_php5 SIGCHLD handler breaks subversion hooks Product: SUSE Linux 10.1 Version: Final Platform: i686 URL: http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/BrowseList?list=de v&by=thread&from=511836 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: postadal(a)novell.com ReportedBy: Franz.Sirl(a)lauterbach.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de CC: mrueckert(a)novell.com see the discussion in the subversion mailing list. http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/BrowseList?list=dev&by=thread&from=51… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 8

[Bug 197805] Use versioned RPM tags for openSUSE-release
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 08 Oct '06

08 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197805 anicka(a)novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 181571] installation: choosed sda3 as location for boot loader, but get installed to MBR
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Oct '06

07 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181571 ------- Comment #6 from timmi(a)gmx-topmail.de 2006-10-07 14:21 MST ------- -> Leslie: Hm. I don't say that your problem isn't a bug or that it isn't important. But it is a problem with partitioning/formating. This has nothing to do with the boot loader (the boot loader even must not be installed in the /boot or the root partition). So I think you should open a new bug with your problem. Here it is out of topic. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 203830] Start of OpenOffice extremely slow
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Oct '06

07 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=203830 ------- Comment #3 from admin(a)eregion.de 2006-10-07 12:50 MST ------- especially when you consider that other java programs run fine fith java 1.5.0 and OOo runs fine with java 1.5.0 on 10.0... anyways, i noticed that quitting OOo also takes ages, i found a similar java process in my process list that took up all the cpu time for several minutes after the window was destroyed... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 193234] sound only after reboot from windows
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Oct '06

07 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193234 ------- Comment #6 from tschaefer(a)t-online.de 2006-10-07 11:15 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=100900) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=100900&action=view) results from http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org/ may be it helps for diagnostic or may be you have influence to BIOS-manufacturer to improve the BIOS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 181571] installation: choosed sda3 as location for boot loader, but get installed to MBR
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Oct '06

07 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181571 ------- Comment #5 from lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com 2006-10-07 10:40 MST ------- This bug is an install stopper. BUG BUG BUG SUSE10.x installer, not only did it merge files to the disk(/dev/sda) that was unchecked/unselected to exclude it in the install process, but the install program formatted the /dev/sda boot and swap partitions, destroying the data that was there and assigning SUSE10 files to them. How was I to later remove that drive? Will the boot and swap files magically appear on the /dev/hda? I suppose that if there are systems with only 1 linux system on 1 hard disk, as opposed to 2 linux versions resident on 2 hard disks, with the safety copy to be migrated to SUSE10 after a successful SUSE10 install, that the bug is inconsequential if the partition is reformatted. But to overwrite a disk that was to be removed after a successful migration to SUSE10.x is a Major critical bug. I went back to Fedora Core 5, I redid the install with it to the damaged disk. Their installer program respected the unchecking of the /dev/hda SUSIE10 install and I rebuilt that system that I lost (on /dev/sda). It only took overnight. I was able to do the install safely, only by physically unplugging the /dev/sda cable from the mother board, and then installing SUSE10.x. In our park of many hundreds of PC's, not all have more than one hard disk, but there are some that do. Again, if Fedora Core5 (rpm based system) can a parallel install correctly, then so SUSE10.x should do so too. If you feel I am out of line, then leave the problem level as is, and let Bugzilla send me a advice when the install process is repaired. I will then re-evaluate SUSE10.x+1 which will of course require a new install dvd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 181571] installation: choosed sda3 as location for boot loader, but get installed to MBR
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Oct '06

07 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181571 ------- Comment #4 from timmi(a)gmx-topmail.de 2006-10-07 08:26 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=100895) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=100895&action=view) YaST2.tar.bz2 - the hole /var/log/YaST2 as tar.bz2 archive The badly written boot loader is a problem that I could now reproduce on another computer. Having yet installed an 10.1. Now installing second (independend) 10.1 from CD. Choosing /dev/hda3 as location for the bootloader (I want to leave the MBR as is and make with the old suse 10.1 an entry there for starting the partition hda3). But the boot loader gets written to MBR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 181571] installation: choosed sda3 as location for boot loader, but get installed to MBR
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Oct '06

07 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181571 timmi(a)gmx-topmail.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P0 - Crit Sit |P2 - High ------- Comment #3 from timmi(a)gmx-topmail.de 2006-10-07 08:24 MST ------- -> Leslie: This bug is about the Boot loader written to a bad place, not about lost data in the partitions. So lowering priority back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 169056] Yast tries to install printer on /dev/null during installation process
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Oct '06

07 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=169056 timmi(a)gmx-topmail.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0