December 2024 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1234471] laptop fails to suspend (sleep) due to issue with nvidia GPU driver
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 13 Dec '24

13 Dec '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234471 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234471#c7 --- Comment #7 from Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch(a)suse.com> --- (forgot to mention that the same error message remained despite he changes I suggested) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234471] laptop fails to suspend (sleep) due to issue with nvidia GPU driver
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 13 Dec '24

13 Dec '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234471 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234471#c6 --- Comment #6 from Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Toby Breckon from comment #4) > Not an immediate fix - shall I also turn off PreserveVideoMemoryAllocations ? > > dmesg extract: > > [ 94.695690] [ T4855] NVRM: GPU 0000:01:00.0: > PreserveVideoMemoryAllocations module parameter is set. System Power > Management attempted without driver procfs suspend interface. Please refer > to the 'Configuring Power Management Support' section in the driver README. > [ 94.695700] [ T4855] nvidia 0000:01:00.0: PM: pci_pm_suspend(): > nv_pmops_suspend [nvidia] returns -5 > [ 94.696464] [ T4855] nvidia 0000:01:00.0: PM: dpm_run_callback(): > pci_pm_suspend returns -5 > [ 94.696531] [ T4855] nvidia 0000:01:00.0: PM: failed to suspend async: > error -5 > [ 95.439210] [ T5099] PM: Some devices failed to suspend, or early wake > event detected Yes, you can try removing PreserveVideoMemoryAllocations=1 from driver options. Don't forget to run 'dracut --force' again afterwards. (In reply to Toby Breckon from comment #5) > Created attachment 879152 [details] > updated /lib/modprobe.d/50-nvidia-default.conf Looks good! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234469] YaST2 Qt UI can't connect to display
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 13 Dec '24

13 Dec '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234469 Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Yast2 gui not working |YaST2 Qt UI can't connect | |to display -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1225688] New: [tw] [hexchat] gnome-shell The program 'hexchat' received an X Window System error when connecting to netwok
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 13 Dec '24

13 Dec '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225688 Bug ID: 1225688 Summary: [tw] [hexchat] gnome-shell The program 'hexchat' received an X Window System error when connecting to netwok Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: aarch64 URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4236088/modules/hexc hat/steps/28 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: GNOME Assignee: gnome-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: richard.fan(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: openQA Blocker: Yes ## Description The issue is a sporadic one, but I can see the issue several times in openQA automation tests. it can be seen on both x86_64 and aarch64 platforms. Steps to reproduce the issue: 1. Upgrade the system from leap15.x to tw 2. start hexchat 3. config a nickname and connect to "Libera.Chat" Error logs like below: >May 30 09:49:37.300575 susetest gnome-shell[30709]: The program 'hexchat' received an X Window System error. >May 30 09:49:37.300575 susetest gnome-shell[30709]: This probably reflects a bug in the program. >May 30 09:49:37.307179 susetest gnome-shell[30709]: The error was 'BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)'. >May 30 09:49:37.307179 susetest gnome-shell[30709]: (Details: serial 6056 error_code 3 request_code 38 minor_code 0) >May 30 09:49:37.307179 susetest gnome-shell[30709]: (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; >May 30 09:49:37.307179 susetest gnome-shell[30709]: that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. >May 30 09:49:37.307179 susetest gnome-shell[30709]: To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line >May 30 09:49:37.307179 susetest gnome-shell[30709]: option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful >May 30 09:49:37.307179 susetest gnome-shell[30709]: backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.) Please refer to the attached log for more information. ## openQA Observation as below: openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-NET-aarch64-zdup-Leap-15.5-gnome@aarch64 fails in [hexchat](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4236088/modules/hexchat/steps/28) ## Test suite description Maintained by qe-core ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20240529](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4235968) ## Expected result Last good: (unknown) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=aarch64&distri=opensu… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1234539] New: VUL-0: : nebula: golang.org/x/crypto/ssh: Misuse of ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback may cause authorization bypass in golang.org/x/crypto
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 13 Dec '24

13 Dec '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234539 Bug ID: 1234539 Summary: VUL-0: : nebula: golang.org/x/crypto/ssh: Misuse of ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback may cause authorization bypass in golang.org/x/crypto Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.5 Hardware: Other URL: https://smash.suse.de/issue/432234/ OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Security Assignee: security-team(a)suse.de Reporter: gianluca.gabrielli(a)suse.com QA Contact: security-team(a)suse.de Blocks: 1234482 Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Applications and libraries which misuse the ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback callback may be susceptible to an authorization bypass. The documentation for ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback says that "A call to this function does not guarantee that the key offered is in fact used to authenticate." Specifically, the SSH protocol allows clients to inquire about whether a public key is acceptable before proving control of the corresponding private key. PublicKeyCallback may be called with multiple keys, and the order in which the keys were provided cannot be used to infer which key the client successfully authenticated with, if any. Some applications, which store the key(s) passed to PublicKeyCallback (or derived information) and make security relevant determinations based on it once the connection is established, may make incorrect assumptions. For example, an attacker may send public keys A and B, and then authenticate with A. PublicKeyCallback would be called only twice, first with A and then with B. A vulnerable application may then make authorization decisions based on key B for which the attacker does not actually control the private key. Since this API is widely misused, as a partial mitigation golang.org/x/cry...@v0.31.0 enforces the property that, when successfully authenticating via public key, the last key passed to ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback will be the key used to authenticate the connection. PublicKeyCallback will now be called multiple times with the same key, if necessary. Note that the client may still not control the last key passed to PublicKeyCallback if the connection is then authenticated with a different method, such as PasswordCallback, KeyboardInteractiveCallback, or NoClientAuth. Users should be using the Extensions field of the Permissions return value from the various authentication callbacks to record data associated with the authentication attempt instead of referencing external state. Once the connection is established the state corresponding to the successful authentication attempt can be retrieved via the ServerConn.Permissions field. Note that some third-party libraries misuse the Permissions type by sharing it across authentication attempts; users of third-party libraries should refer to the relevant projects for guidance. References: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-45337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45337 https://github.com/golang/crypto/commit/b4f1988a35dee11ec3e05d6bf3e90b695fb… https://go.dev/cl/635315 https://go.dev/issue/70779 https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/-nPEi39gI4Q/m/cGVPJCqdAQAJ https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2024-3321 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/12/11/2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2331720 https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main//cves/2024/45xxx/CVE-2024… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1234505] New: VUL-0: : vhs: golang.org/x/crypto/ssh: Misuse of ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback may cause authorization bypass in golang.org/x/crypto
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 13 Dec '24

13 Dec '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234505 Bug ID: 1234505 Summary: VUL-0: : vhs: golang.org/x/crypto/ssh: Misuse of ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback may cause authorization bypass in golang.org/x/crypto Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.5 Hardware: Other URL: https://smash.suse.de/issue/432234/ OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Security Assignee: security-team(a)suse.de Reporter: gianluca.gabrielli(a)suse.com QA Contact: security-team(a)suse.de Blocks: 1234482 Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Applications and libraries which misuse the ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback callback may be susceptible to an authorization bypass. The documentation for ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback says that "A call to this function does not guarantee that the key offered is in fact used to authenticate." Specifically, the SSH protocol allows clients to inquire about whether a public key is acceptable before proving control of the corresponding private key. PublicKeyCallback may be called with multiple keys, and the order in which the keys were provided cannot be used to infer which key the client successfully authenticated with, if any. Some applications, which store the key(s) passed to PublicKeyCallback (or derived information) and make security relevant determinations based on it once the connection is established, may make incorrect assumptions. For example, an attacker may send public keys A and B, and then authenticate with A. PublicKeyCallback would be called only twice, first with A and then with B. A vulnerable application may then make authorization decisions based on key B for which the attacker does not actually control the private key. Since this API is widely misused, as a partial mitigation golang.org/x/cry...@v0.31.0 enforces the property that, when successfully authenticating via public key, the last key passed to ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback will be the key used to authenticate the connection. PublicKeyCallback will now be called multiple times with the same key, if necessary. Note that the client may still not control the last key passed to PublicKeyCallback if the connection is then authenticated with a different method, such as PasswordCallback, KeyboardInteractiveCallback, or NoClientAuth. Users should be using the Extensions field of the Permissions return value from the various authentication callbacks to record data associated with the authentication attempt instead of referencing external state. Once the connection is established the state corresponding to the successful authentication attempt can be retrieved via the ServerConn.Permissions field. Note that some third-party libraries misuse the Permissions type by sharing it across authentication attempts; users of third-party libraries should refer to the relevant projects for guidance. References: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-45337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45337 https://github.com/golang/crypto/commit/b4f1988a35dee11ec3e05d6bf3e90b695fb… https://go.dev/cl/635315 https://go.dev/issue/70779 https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/-nPEi39gI4Q/m/cGVPJCqdAQAJ https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2024-3321 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/12/11/2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2331720 https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main//cves/2024/45xxx/CVE-2024… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1234471] laptop fails to suspend (sleep) due to issue with nvidia GPU driver
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 13 Dec '24

13 Dec '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234471 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234471#c5 --- Comment #5 from Toby Breckon <toby(a)breckon.org> --- Created attachment 879152 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=879152&action=edit updated /lib/modprobe.d/50-nvidia-default.conf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234471] laptop fails to suspend (sleep) due to issue with nvidia GPU driver
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 13 Dec '24

13 Dec '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234471 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234471#c4 --- Comment #4 from Toby Breckon <toby(a)breckon.org> --- Not an immediate fix - shall I also turn off PreserveVideoMemoryAllocations ? dmesg extract: [ 94.695690] [ T4855] NVRM: GPU 0000:01:00.0: PreserveVideoMemoryAllocations module parameter is set. System Power Management attempted without driver procfs suspend interface. Please refer to the 'Configuring Power Management Support' section in the driver README. [ 94.695700] [ T4855] nvidia 0000:01:00.0: PM: pci_pm_suspend(): nv_pmops_suspend [nvidia] returns -5 [ 94.696464] [ T4855] nvidia 0000:01:00.0: PM: dpm_run_callback(): pci_pm_suspend returns -5 [ 94.696531] [ T4855] nvidia 0000:01:00.0: PM: failed to suspend async: error -5 [ 95.439210] [ T5099] PM: Some devices failed to suspend, or early wake event detected -- /lib/modprobe.d/50-nvidia-default.conf attached -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234454] Compiling external modules fails with "/usr/src/linux-6.13.0-rc2-1.gf92fc5d/include/config/auto.conf: No such file or directory"
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 13 Dec '24

13 Dec '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234454 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234454#c2 --- Comment #2 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- Nevermind, rpm/kernel-binary.spec.in's: echo include ../../../%{basename:%src_install_dir}/Makefile > %rpm_install_dir/%cpu_arch_flavor/Makefile is wrong after: commit 822b11a74ba2bc79ddd4165d55e988514c053d71 Author: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy(a)kernel.org> Date: Sun Nov 10 10:34:37 2024 +0900 kbuild: use absolute path in the generated wrapper Makefile We are missing the KBUILD_OUTPUT setting. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1234521] New: VUL-0: : rclone: golang.org/x/crypto/ssh: Misuse of ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback may cause authorization bypass in golang.org/x/crypto
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 13 Dec '24

13 Dec '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234521 Bug ID: 1234521 Summary: VUL-0: : rclone: golang.org/x/crypto/ssh: Misuse of ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback may cause authorization bypass in golang.org/x/crypto Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.5 Hardware: Other URL: https://smash.suse.de/issue/432234/ OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Security Assignee: security-team(a)suse.de Reporter: gianluca.gabrielli(a)suse.com QA Contact: security-team(a)suse.de Blocks: 1234482 Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Applications and libraries which misuse the ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback callback may be susceptible to an authorization bypass. The documentation for ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback says that "A call to this function does not guarantee that the key offered is in fact used to authenticate." Specifically, the SSH protocol allows clients to inquire about whether a public key is acceptable before proving control of the corresponding private key. PublicKeyCallback may be called with multiple keys, and the order in which the keys were provided cannot be used to infer which key the client successfully authenticated with, if any. Some applications, which store the key(s) passed to PublicKeyCallback (or derived information) and make security relevant determinations based on it once the connection is established, may make incorrect assumptions. For example, an attacker may send public keys A and B, and then authenticate with A. PublicKeyCallback would be called only twice, first with A and then with B. A vulnerable application may then make authorization decisions based on key B for which the attacker does not actually control the private key. Since this API is widely misused, as a partial mitigation golang.org/x/cry...@v0.31.0 enforces the property that, when successfully authenticating via public key, the last key passed to ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback will be the key used to authenticate the connection. PublicKeyCallback will now be called multiple times with the same key, if necessary. Note that the client may still not control the last key passed to PublicKeyCallback if the connection is then authenticated with a different method, such as PasswordCallback, KeyboardInteractiveCallback, or NoClientAuth. Users should be using the Extensions field of the Permissions return value from the various authentication callbacks to record data associated with the authentication attempt instead of referencing external state. Once the connection is established the state corresponding to the successful authentication attempt can be retrieved via the ServerConn.Permissions field. Note that some third-party libraries misuse the Permissions type by sharing it across authentication attempts; users of third-party libraries should refer to the relevant projects for guidance. References: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-45337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45337 https://github.com/golang/crypto/commit/b4f1988a35dee11ec3e05d6bf3e90b695fb… https://go.dev/cl/635315 https://go.dev/issue/70779 https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/-nPEi39gI4Q/m/cGVPJCqdAQAJ https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2024-3321 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/12/11/2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2331720 https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main//cves/2024/45xxx/CVE-2024… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4