September 2021 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1006958] New: gdb build often stalls on OBS
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1006958 Bug ID: 1006958 Summary: gdb build often stalls on OBS Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- gdb is among the list of packages that often cause a stall in OBS - OBS detects this after a while and cancels the build. The issue though is that unreliable builds are a pain and must not happen (especially when being a ring package; it is built very often in the stagings and every fail requires the staging managers to interact) The current fail I have here stops with: <[ 6299s] Running target unix/-m32/-fPIC/-pie >[ 6299s] Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for target. >[ 6299s] Using /usr/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target. >[ 6299s] Using /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gdb-7.11.1/gdb/testsuite/config/unix.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface file. >[ 6299s] Running /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gdb-7.11.1/gdb/testsuite/gdb.xml/tdesc-arch.exp ... >[ 6299s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gdb-7.11.1/build-x86_64-suse-linux/gdb/gdb version 7.11.1 -nw -nx -data-directory /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gdb-7.11.1/build-x86_64-suse-linux/gdb/testsuite.unix.-m32.-fPIC.-pie/../data-directory >[ 6299s] >[ 6299s] >[ 6299s] === gdb Summary === >[ 6299s] >[ 6299s] # of expected passes 8 >[ 6300s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gdb-7.11.1/build-x86_64-suse-linux/gdb/gdb version 7.11.1 -nw -nx -data-directory /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gdb-7.11.1/build-x86_64-suse-linux/gdb/testsuite.unix.-m32.-fPIC.-pie/../data-directory >[ 6300s] >[35104s] ### WATCHDOG MARKER END ### >[35104s] No buildstatus set, either the base system is broken (kernel/initrd/udev/glibc/bash/perl) >[35104s] or the build host has a kernel or hardware problem... > > >Job seems to be stuck here, killed. (after 28800 seconds of inactivity) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 2

[Bug 993011] New: [openQA] CTRL-ALT-DEL does not show the logout dialog
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=993011 Bug ID: 993011 Summary: [openQA] CTRL-ALT-DEL does not show the logout dialog Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE Workspace (Plasma) Assignee: opensuse-kde-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Seen by openQA tests, e.g. https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/239654 After the system was upgraded from openSUSE 13.2 to Tumbleweed (20160808, first to have plasma 5.7.2), the logout dialog no longer shows when pressing ctrl-alt-del This appears on updates performed using the DVD and boot from the Network CD, but seems not to happen in the case when the system was updated using zdup. The tests had been re-run a couple times. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 941884] New: libcamgm fails test suite due to expired certificates
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=941884 Bug ID: 941884 Summary: libcamgm fails test suite due to expired certificates Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Factory Version: 201505* Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: YaST2 Assignee: yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- since recently, libcamgm no longer passes the test suite... the build lo ends with: [...] [ 358s] Running ListTest... [ 358s] Output doesn't match expected data: [ 358s] --- ./single.out/ListTest.out 2014-04-12 17:19:43.000000000 +0000 [ 358s] +++ ./single.out/out/ListTest.out 2015-08-16 18:11:50.226671071 +0000 [ 358s] @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ [ 358s] country = DE [ 358s] emailAddress = suse(a)suse.de [ 358s] serial = 07 [ 358s] -status = Valid [ 358s] +status = Expired [ 358s] New Entry [ 358s] certificate = 08:40717a16174dc4d516f6fa7ee8eeb18c-1124792802 [ 358s] commonName = Full Test Certificate [ 358s] @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ [ 358s] country = DE [ 358s] emailAddress = suse(a)suse.de [ 358s] serial = 0B [ 358s] -status = Valid [ 358s] +status = Expired [ 358s] getCertificateList successfully executed [ 358s] =================== end List tests ======================== [ 358s] DONE [ 358s] FAIL: ListTest [...] [ 364s] Running VerifyTest... [ 365s] Output doesn't match expected data: [ 365s] --- ./single.out/VerifyTest.out 2014-04-12 17:19:43.000000000 +0000 [ 365s] +++ ./single.out/out/VerifyTest.out 2015-08-16 18:11:57.086773026 +0000 [ 365s] @@ -6,10 +6,10 @@ [ 365s] 04: Verify failed: Found revoked certificate [ 365s] 05: Verify failed: Found revoked certificate [ 365s] 06: Verify failed: Found revoked certificate [ 365s] -07: Verify success [ 365s] +07: Verify failed: Found expired certificate [ 365s] 08: Verify failed: Found expired certificate [ 365s] 09: Verify failed: Found revoked certificate [ 365s] 0A: Verify failed: Found expired certificate [ 365s] -0B: Verify success [ 365s] +0B: Verify failed: Found expired certificate [ 365s] =================== end List tests ======================== [ 365s] DONE [ 365s] FAIL: VerifyTest [...] libcamgm is a dependency to yast2-ca-management, which in turn is required by yast2-auth-server (which is why a delete request for libcamgm back in May could not be fullfilled) This whole thing is a ring, packae, causing all stagings to fail, hence I mark it major -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 6

[Bug 1002565] New: can't install ruby2.2-rubygem-rhc-testsuite-1.35.3-1.5.x86_64
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002565 Bug ID: 1002565 Summary: can't install ruby2.2-rubygem-rhc-testsuite-1.35.3-1.5.x86_64 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- can't install ruby2.2-rubygem-rhc-testsuite-1.35.3-1.5.x86_64 zypper in ruby2.2-rubygem-rhc-testsuite-1.35.3-1.5.x86_64 Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... Resolving package dependencies... >Problem: nothing provides rubygem(ruby:2.2.0:commander) < 4.3.0 needed by ruby2.2-rubygem-rhc-1.35.3-1.5.x86_64 > Solution 1: do not install ruby2.2-rubygem-rhc-testsuite-1.35.3-1.5.x86_64 > Solution 2: break ruby2.2-rubygem-rhc-1.35.3-1.5.x86_64 by ignoring some of its dependencies -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 2

[Bug 1167866] New: [Build 20200325] yast2 inst_release_notes: no rel notes shown
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1167866 Bug ID: 1167866 Summary: [Build 20200325] yast2 inst_release_notes: no rel notes shown Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1215118/modules/libq t5_qtbase/steps/28 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: YaST2 Assignee: yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- ## Observation openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-x86_64-extra_tests_on_gnome@64bit fails in [libqt5_qtbase](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1215118/modules/libqt5_qtb… https://build.opensuse.org/package/rdiff/openSUSE:Factory/yast2-installatio… yast2-installation dropped the recommends on release-notes, which we consider wrong. This package contains the inst_release_notes module to show the release notes and is thus the most logical place to also recommend the installation of said notes it wants to show to the user. ## Test suite description Maintainer: asmorodskyi, okurz. Extra tests which were designed to run on gnome ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20200309](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1199785) ## Expected result Last good: [20200307](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1198559) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=opensus… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1175288] New: [installcheck] ruby2.7-rubygem-tins is not installable
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1175288 Bug ID: 1175288 Summary: [installcheck] ruby2.7-rubygem-tins is not installable Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Ruby Assignee: ruby-devel(a)suse.de Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- > sudo zypper in ruby2.7-rubygem-tins Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... Resolving package dependencies... Problem: nothing provides rubygem(ruby:2.7.0:sync) >= 0 needed by ruby2.7-rubygem-tins-1.24.1-1.3.x86_64 Solution 1: do not install ruby2.7-rubygem-tins-1.24.1-1.3.x86_64 Solution 2: break ruby2.7-rubygem-tins-1.24.1-1.3.x86_64 by ignoring some of its dependencies -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[opensuse-bugs] [Bug 1179196] New: [Build 20201124] openQA test fails in tflite2 - python-h5py fails to build
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1179196 Bug ID: 1179196 Summary: [Build 20201124] openQA test fails in tflite2 - python-h5py fails to build Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1483606/modules/tfli te2/steps/28 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: OpenStack Assignee: cloud-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: openQA Blocker: Yes ## Observation openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-x86_64-extra_tests_ai_ml@64bit fails in [tflite2](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1483606/modules/tflite2/steps/28) 0| 2020-11-25 06:51:05 <1> susetest(1502) [zypp::solver] SATResolver.cc(problems):1207 nothing provides libhdf5_hl100 = 1.10.5 needed by python3-h5py-2.10.0-2.4.x86_64 The issue there is that python-h5py failed to rebuild against the updated hdf package: https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory/python-h… ## Test suite description Test AI/ML software ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20201124](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1483606) (current job) ## Expected result Last good: [20201123](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1482495) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=opensus… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1189868] New: [Build 20210825] 389ds: dsctl status fails
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189868 Bug ID: 1189868 Summary: [Build 20210825] 389ds: dsctl status fails Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1888017/modules/open ldap_to_389ds/steps/75 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: openQA Blocker: Yes ## Observation openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-x86_64-openldap_to_389ds@64bit fails in [openldap_to_389ds](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1888017/modules/openld… Error: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get' WVImd-1- ## Test suite description ldap_to_389ds tools test Maintainer: wegao(a)suse.com ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20210825](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1887217) ## Expected result Last good: [20210824](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1885598) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=opensus… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 1188283] New: vim: skeleton files loaded twice
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188283 Bug ID: 1188283 Summary: vim: skeleton files loaded twice Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- This is a rather long-standing issue (annoying, but easy to live with) starting 'vi newfile.spec' loads a skeleton into vi with a basic structure of a spec file - so far, so good. unfortunately, it loads the skeleton twice, which is kinda annoying the file comes from vim-data, and is installed in /usr/share/vim/vim82/skeletons (there exists a symlink usr/share/vim/current -> usr/share/vim/vim82) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1186338] New: mdbtools 0.9.3: invonsistent header being installed
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1186338 Bug ID: 1186338 Summary: mdbtools 0.9.3: invonsistent header being installed Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Issue detected while building libgda against mbdtools 0.9.3: [ 66s] /usr/include/mdbtools.h:38:10: fatal error: mdbfakeglib.h: No such file or directory [ 66s] 38 | #include <mdbfakeglib.h> The problem there is that /usr/include/mdbtools.h does #ifdef HAVE_GLIB #include <glib.h> #else #include <mdbfakeglib.h> #endif This is probably something it tries to do for its own build system, but when building libgda, this now somewhat relies on 'something' setting HAVE_GLIB. One easy way out would be to inject -DHAVE_GLIB into the .pc file (after all, it has requires: glib-2.0, so we are sure to have glib) I tested that on a local build, which does indeed work around the issue in libgda (but then have different build failures, likely coming from API changes though) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2