September 2021 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1190765] VUL-0: chromium: multiple security issues fixed in 94.0.4606.54
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 22 Sep '21

22 Sep '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190765 Marcus Meissner <meissner(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |meissner(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1190689] update plasma kwin_x11 is not able to run /usrlib64/libexec/drkonqui
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 22 Sep '21

22 Sep '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190689 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190689#c3 Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID Flags|needinfo?(ivo.grimaldi@gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #3 from Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> --- Let's close this as invalid then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1190272] Most volumes gets unmounted after boot
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 22 Sep '21

22 Sep '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190272 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190272#c6 Franck Bui <fbui(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |IN_PROGRESS CC| |mchang(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(mchang(a)suse.com) --- Comment #6 from Franck Bui <fbui(a)suse.com> --- Michael, do you think we could add the '--no-reload' option ? I think the disablement of grub2-once.service is only relevant for the next reboot, right ? I know it would be a workaround for bsc#1137373 but in that case adding '--no-reload' shouldn't hurt and would avoid the reloading of PID1 configuration which is a relatively costly operation, which is a good thing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1190689] update plasma kwin_x11 is not able to run /usrlib64/libexec/drkonqui
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 22 Sep '21

22 Sep '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190689 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190689#c2 --- Comment #2 from ivo grimaldi <ivo.grimaldi(a)gmail.com> --- ok next step for me, now is important to have a stable system, so i decided to remove 4 repo for newest kde plasma ok I have not the core dump Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1116625] NetworkManager stops automount units when system is being suspended but doesn't reactivate them after resuming
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 22 Sep '21

22 Sep '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116625 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116625#c54 Hans-Peter Jansen <hp.jansen(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hp.jansen(a)suse.com --- Comment #54 from Hans-Peter Jansen <hp.jansen(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Olaf Hering from comment #53) > Just a reminder: > This bug is for Leap. > It is still broken in Leap... The patch should be back portable easily. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1189137] [doc] Example 4.72: Example firewall section
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 22 Sep '21

22 Sep '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189137 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189137#c4 Imobach Gonzalez Sosa <igonzalezsosa(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(igonzalezsosa@sus | |e.com) | --- Comment #4 from Imobach Gonzalez Sosa <igonzalezsosa(a)suse.com> --- Yes, it is wrong. I have fixed the example in this PR: https://github.com/SUSE/doc-sle/pull/964. Thanks! Regards, Imo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1190499] Create default collection after DBus.Error.UnknownObject
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 22 Sep '21

22 Sep '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190499 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190499#c2 --- Comment #2 from Alynx Zhou <alynx.zhou(a)suse.com> --- https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/920800 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1190761] New: Enable python39 build for tensorflow2
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 22 Sep '21

22 Sep '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1190761 Bug ID: 1190761 Summary: Enable python39 build for tensorflow2 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development Assignee: cgoll(a)suse.com Reporter: qydwhotmail(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- As tensorflow 2.5.0 has added python 3.9 support, can you enable python39 build for tensorflow2? Thanks in advance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1190670] [Build 20210917][glibc2.34] docker blocks clone3 syscall
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 22 Sep '21

22 Sep '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190670 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190670#c6 --- Comment #6 from Aleksa Sarai <asarai(a)suse.com> --- Trying to avoid rehashing the discussion we had at the beginning of the year, the issue boils down to Docker profiles being written assuming that any excluded syscalls get EPERM. runc has had support for setting the default errno to ENOSYS for a while, but Docker hasn't yet migrated. The problem is that you cannot rewrite every profile with default EPERM to a profile that has explicit EPERM and default ENOSYS due to limitations in libseccomp. The non-existence of an inverse of SCMP_MASKED_EQ is one issue[1], but the main issue is that you cannot have more than one rule applied to the same argument with libseccomp -- meaning it's not possible to invert any OR rules that apply to an argument. The net result is that clone2(2) or socket(2) will return -ENOSYS for some arguments when it should be returning -EPERM. The solution I put in runc at the beginning of the year was the best I could think of (after trying many alternatives that would've been more robust but were not possible to do due to libseccomp limitations), but it relies on Docker being careful when they update their syscall table -- they weren't careful and now we're in this situation. On a more practical note, I've backported the patch to unbreak clone3. It's already in Factory and I am submitting a MR for SLES, which is the most we can do at the moment unfortunately. I opened [2] to re-open discussions on this topic with Docker upstream. [1]: https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/issues/310 [2]: https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/42871 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1190096] VUL-0: chromium: update to 93.0.4577.63
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 22 Sep '21

22 Sep '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190096 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190096#c3 --- Comment #3 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp(a)suse.de> --- # maintenance_jira_update_notice openSUSE-SU-2021:1300-1: An update that fixes 28 vulnerabilities is now available. Category: security (important) Bug References: 1190096,1190476 CVE References: CVE-2021-30606,CVE-2021-30607,CVE-2021-30608,CVE-2021-30609,CVE-2021-30610,CVE-2021-30611,CVE-2021-30612,CVE-2021-30613,CVE-2021-30614,CVE-2021-30615,CVE-2021-30616,CVE-2021-30617,CVE-2021-30618,CVE-2021-30619,CVE-2021-30620,CVE-2021-30621,CVE-2021-30622,CVE-2021-30623,CVE-2021-30624,CVE-2021-30625,CVE-2021-30626,CVE-2021-30627,CVE-2021-30628,CVE-2021-30629,CVE-2021-30630,CVE-2021-30631,CVE-2021-30632,CVE-2021-30633 JIRA References: Sources used: openSUSE Backports SLE-15-SP3 (src): chromium-93.0.4577.82-bp153.2.28.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0