July 2021 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1187515] KDE Live (Build9.88) is missing MOKManager
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jul '21

01 Jul '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187515 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187515#c2 Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CONFIRMED CC| |dcassany(a)suse.com Component|Bootloader |Live Medium Assignee|glin(a)suse.com |ms(a)suse.com Flags|needinfo?(fvogt(a)suse.com) | --- Comment #2 from Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Gary Ching-Pang Lin from comment #1) > Hi Fabian, > > I heard that you're working on the Live media. Could you help to check the > config of KDE Live and see if MokManager.efi is copied to \EFI\BOOT? It's indeed missing. For some reason kiwi doesn't use shim-install, but handles the copying itself and that code doesn't handle MokManager. Reassigning to kiwi. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1187910] [netcdf-fortran] Nothing provides nf-config
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jul '21

01 Jul '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187910 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187910#c4 --- Comment #4 from Peter Hill <zed.three(a)gmail.com> --- > I will see what I can do without getting complained at by rpmlint for not adhering to some packaging guideline. > At least I will make the packages containing these tools prerequisites of the -devel packages. Thanks, that would be useful! > The non-environment module versions were there before I started creating the > variant using environment modules so I kept them around. After all, I did not want > to disfranchise existing users. There was no netcdf-fortran package when I started > it. Having both variants makes the spec file even more complex and I did not need > non-environment module versions as this is usually not what one wants to use in an > HPC environment. > Now, with containers, this may change. On the other hand, I'm not sure if it is a > good idea to go thru packages for building these. Personally, I use these packages in a non-HPC environment, and having the non-module versions is definitely nice. It would help things feel more consistent at least. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1174735] [doc] Figure 1.3: GNOME Desktop
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jul '21

01 Jul '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174735 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174735#c1 Tom�� Ba��ant <tbazant(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CONFIRMED CC| |tbazant(a)suse.com Whiteboard| |https://jira.suse.com/brows | |e/DOCTEAM-249 --- Comment #1 from Tom�� Ba��ant <tbazant(a)suse.com> --- Thank you for reporting this bug! It is being tracked and processed as part of our queue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1174794] [doc] 4.1.4 The Semi-Automatic Section
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jul '21

01 Jul '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174794 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174794#c2 Tom�� Ba��ant <tbazant(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CONFIRMED CC| |tbazant(a)suse.com Assignee|fs(a)suse.com |cschroder(a)suse.com Whiteboard| |https://jira.suse.com/brows | |e/DOCTEAM-247 --- Comment #2 from Tom�� Ba��ant <tbazant(a)suse.com> --- Thank you for reporting this bug! It is being tracked and processed as part of our queue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1171006] kernel RPM installation requires significantly more free space on /boot filesystem for Leap 15.2 Kernels
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jul '21

01 Jul '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171006 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171006#c8 Tom�� Ba��ant <tbazant(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CONFIRMED CC| |tbazant(a)suse.com Whiteboard| |https://jira.suse.com/brows | |e/DOCTEAM-246 --- Comment #8 from Tom�� Ba��ant <tbazant(a)suse.com> --- Thank you for reporting this bug! It is being tracked and processed as part of our queue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1187910] [netcdf-fortran] Nothing provides nf-config
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jul '21

01 Jul '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187910 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187910#c3 --- Comment #3 from Egbert Eich <eich(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Peter Hill from comment #2) > +1 for renaming back to `nf-config` -- this is the standard name that many > build tools will be looking for. As far as I can tell, OpenSUSE is the only > OS that names it this way. > > The package name is a little bit confusing too: > > - nc-config is provided by netcdf-devel > - ncxx4-config is provided by netcdf-cxx4-tools > - nf-fortran-config is provided by netcdf-fortran_4_5_3-gnu-hpc > > Would it be possible to have the `*-config` utilities be provided by the > `*-devel` packages? It's not clear to me why they are packaged separately. > Even having them as recommended packages would be useful. I will see what I can do without getting complained at by rpmlint for not adhering to some packaging guideline. At least I will make the packages containing these tools prerequisites of the -devel packages. > >> Separately, there is no non-environment module `netcdf-fortran` package. > > > No, there isn't. This is not a bug. > > Please could you say why this is? Clearly there's a reason, but I find it a > bit confusing that there are non-environment module versions of the C and > C++ libraries, just not for Fortran. The .mod files obviously depend on the > compiler, but I would expect the system package to require the system > compiler. `hdf5-devel`, for example, does include the Fortran .mod files in > the non-module package. The non-environment module versions were there before I started creating the variant using environment modules so I kept them around. After all, I did not want to disfranchise existing users. There was no netcdf-fortran package when I started it. Having both variants makes the spec file even more complex and I did not need non-environment module versions as this is usually not what one wants to use in an HPC environment. Now, with containers, this may change. On the other hand, I'm not sure if it is a good idea to go thru packages for building these. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1182227] combustion [# combustion: network] does not work
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jul '21

01 Jul '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182227 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182227#c32 --- Comment #32 from Marius Tomaschewski <mt(a)suse.com> --- Ok, the initial cleanup is in https://github.com/openSUSE/wicked/pull/873 Thomas, Fabian, could you please review/test if the vlan=,bond=,team=,bridge=,ip= generate some errors/warnings on stderr in a: `wicked show-config --ifconfig dracut:cmdline:/tmp/dracut.cmdline` or the configs in the output are missing something or you see coding bugs I've added? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1187859] filesystem repository path missmatch on Leap15.3 and SLE 15SP3
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jul '21

01 Jul '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187859 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187859#c6 Adrian Schr�ter <adrian.schroeter(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|ro(a)suse.com |hare(a)suse.com --- Comment #6 from Adrian Schr�ter <adrian.schroeter(a)suse.com> --- rudi neither... fixed it now in agreement with dirk mueller (who is maintainer) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1187914] New: VUL-0: CVE-2019-25048: libressl: heap-based buffer over-read in do_print_ex()
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jul '21

01 Jul '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1187914 Bug ID: 1187914 Summary: VUL-0: CVE-2019-25048: libressl: heap-based buffer over-read in do_print_ex() Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.2 Hardware: Other URL: https://smash.suse.de/issue/303348/ OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: Security Assignee: jengelh(a)inai.de Reporter: rfrohl(a)suse.com QA Contact: security-team(a)suse.de Found By: Security Response Team Blocker: --- CVE-2019-25048 LibreSSL 2.9.1 through 3.2.1 has a heap-based buffer over-read in do_print_ex (called from asn1_item_print_ctx and ASN1_item_print). References: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2019-25048 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=13914 https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/libressl/OSV-2020-… https://github.com/libressl-portable/portable/commit/17c88164016df821df2dff… http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-25048 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1187913] New: VUL-1: CVE-2019-25049: libressl: out-of-bounds read in asn1_item_print_ctx()
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jul '21

01 Jul '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1187913 Bug ID: 1187913 Summary: VUL-1: CVE-2019-25049: libressl: out-of-bounds read in asn1_item_print_ctx() Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.2 Hardware: Other URL: https://smash.suse.de/issue/303347/ OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: Security Assignee: jengelh(a)inai.de Reporter: rfrohl(a)suse.com QA Contact: security-team(a)suse.de Found By: Security Response Team Blocker: --- CVE-2019-25049 LibreSSL 2.9.1 through 3.2.1 has an out-of-bounds read in asn1_item_print_ctx (called from asn1_template_print_ctx). References: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2019-25049 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=13920 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-25049 https://github.com/libressl-portable/portable/commit/17c88164016df821df2dff… https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/libressl/OSV-2020-… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2