July 2021 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1187910] [netcdf-fortran] Nothing provides nf-config
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jul '21

01 Jul '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187910 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187910#c5 Egbert Eich <eich(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #5 from Egbert Eich <eich(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Peter Hill from comment #4) > > I will see what I can do without getting complained at by rpmlint for not adhering to some packaging guideline. > > At least I will make the packages containing these tools prerequisites of the -devel packages. > > Thanks, that would be useful! I've fixed this for netcdf-fortran and netcdf-cxx4 now. In both cases, *-config has been moved to the devel package. This way, I was able to get rid of two binary packages. Unfortunately, these won't be available until the netcdf build is fixed - which is most likely a fallout of the gcc update. If there isn't a fix upstream, yet, it may take a while for me to get to it. > > The non-environment module versions were there before I started creating the > > variant using environment modules so I kept them around. After all, I did not want > > to disfranchise existing users. There was no netcdf-fortran package when I started > > it. Having both variants makes the spec file even more complex and I did not need > > non-environment module versions as this is usually not what one wants to use in an > > HPC environment. > > Now, with containers, this may change. On the other hand, I'm not sure if it is a > > good idea to go thru packages for building these. > > Personally, I use these packages in a non-HPC environment, and having the > non-module versions is definitely nice. It would help things feel more > consistent at least. Well, this is a community project, if someone would make a submission I'd review it and if it's ok I'd accept it. But packaging is not my favorite pasttime and I don't need these for my work either ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1187425] New: zypper resolves OBS URLs wrongly
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jul '21

01 Jul '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1187425 Bug ID: 1187425 Summary: zypper resolves OBS URLs wrongly Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.3 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: marius.kittler(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 850320 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=850320&action=edit How to reproduce & expected behavior # problem It is possible to use an URL with the scheme `obs://` to point to an OBS project. This worked in Leap 15.2 but seems to be broken in Leap 15.3. Apparently the `obs://` URLs are resolved by `zypper` which wrongly omits the `openSUSE_`-prefix when determining the actual download URL. # steps to reproduce and expected behavior The problem can be reproduced using the container image of Leap 15.3. Checkout the attached file for the command to reproduce. I have also appended a version using Leap 15.2 to show how it is actually supposed to behave. # further details This breaks openQA's bootstrapping script: https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/93609 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 18

[Bug 1180903] New: official tumbleweed update recommendation
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jul '21

01 Jul '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180903 Bug ID: 1180903 Summary: official tumbleweed update recommendation Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Documentation Assignee: fs(a)suse.com Reporter: schartnerw(a)outlook.com QA Contact: adrian.schroeter(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- hello I looked in the wiki of opensuse Tumbleweed how often you should update tumbleweed or how long you can omit the snapshots in between but found nothing. opinions differ in various forums. i wanted to ask what the tumbleweed developers officially recommend as a guideline. I use tumbleweed myself, but I'm not sure I always have to update to the latest snapshot immediately or is it enough if I only update twice a week. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1187138] Document required AutoYaST XML changes for Leap 15.3
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jul '21

01 Jul '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187138 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187138#c3 --- Comment #3 from Carla Schroder <cschroder(a)suse.com> --- Hi Georg, thanks for reporting this. Can you give some examples? The AY Guide is huge! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1175132] go1.15 release tracking
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jul '21

01 Jul '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175132 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175132#c44 --- Comment #44 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp(a)suse.de> --- openSUSE-SU-2021:0950-1: An update that solves four vulnerabilities and has one errata is now available. Category: security (important) Bug References: 1175132,1186622,1187443,1187444,1187445 CVE References: CVE-2021-33195,CVE-2021-33196,CVE-2021-33197,CVE-2021-33198 JIRA References: Sources used: openSUSE Leap 15.2 (src): go1.15-1.15.13-lp152.20.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1187906] New: /etc/dhcp/dhclient.d/chrony.sh references non-existent /usr/share/chrony-helper
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jul '21

01 Jul '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1187906 Bug ID: 1187906 Summary: /etc/dhcp/dhclient.d/chrony.sh references non-existent /usr/share/chrony-helper Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Network Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: opensuse(a)arnavion.dev QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- [1] moved /usr/share/chrony-helper to /usr/lib/chrony/helper and subsequently to /usr/libexec/chrony/helper but did not change /etc/dhcp/dhclient.d/chrony.sh [2] So /etc/dhcp/dhclient.d/chrony.sh references non-existent script to register the NTP servers in DHCP response with chronyd. [1]: https://build.opensuse.org/package/rdiff/network:time/chrony?linkrev=base&r… [2]: https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/network:time/chrony/chrony.dhc… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1187906] /etc/dhcp/dhclient.d/chrony.sh references non-existent /usr/share/chrony-helper
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jul '21

01 Jul '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187906 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187906#c1 Reinhard Max <max(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Reinhard Max <max(a)suse.com> --- Fix submitted to Factory, SLE was not affected. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1187926] New: unable to mount a nfs file system exported from a machine running kernel 5.13
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jul '21

01 Jul '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1187926 Bug ID: 1187926 Summary: unable to mount a nfs file system exported from a machine running kernel 5.13 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: manfred.h(a)gmx.net QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Description available at: <https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213607> Patch available at: <https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213607#c7> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1187924] New: Enable HTTPS on widehat.opensuse.org
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jul '21

01 Jul '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1187924 Bug ID: 1187924 Summary: Enable HTTPS on widehat.opensuse.org Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: P5 - None Component: 3rd party software Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: eroca(a)suse.com QA Contact: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hello, I was wondering why widehat.o.o is accessible via HTTP only. It would be nice to have HTTPS too. Regards Eli -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1179871] jira.suse.com and rocketchat show UTC time rather than local time when setting the timezeone to Beijing
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jul '21

01 Jul '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179871 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179871#c10 --- Comment #10 from Mark�ta Machov� <mmachova(a)suse.com> --- Nobody cares? Well, then... I didn't ask the people, but from the recent heated discussion in tz mailing list I grasped few things: 1. Maintainers don't like to introduce new links and rather delete them (so we are on our own here). 2. Many programs using the tz database (especially the ones written in/for java) don't respect any links anyway. 3. The database is inconsistent in many ways, but every attempt to fix it hits the wall. So it only confirms the things Marguerite wrote. But I think trying to fix jira would be hopeless (because java). Chromium could still be saved, but we need maintainers insight to it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0