May 2021 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1185601] Black screen / no screen output after upgrading from 5.11 to 5.12
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 May '21

04 May '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185601 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185601#c8 --- Comment #8 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Thanks! Then could you open an upstream bug report, gitlab.freedesktop.org Issues? It's definitely worth for tracking in the upstream side. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1185601] Black screen / no screen output after upgrading from 5.11 to 5.12
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 May '21

04 May '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185601 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185601#c7 --- Comment #7 from Wolfgang Wander <wwcsmail(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 849024 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=849024&action=edit dmesg with drm.debug=0x1e on DELL XPS 15 7590 (5.12.0 drm-tip boot) And for completeness - the same with the drm-tip kernel suggested above. It too only brings up a back-lit black screen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1185601] Black screen / no screen output after upgrading from 5.11 to 5.12
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 May '21

04 May '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185601 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185601#c6 --- Comment #6 from Wolfgang Wander <wwcsmail(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 849023 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=849023&action=edit dmesg with drm.debug=0x1e on DELL XPS 15 7590 (5.11.16 boot) Same as before, just with a 5.11.16 kernel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1185601] Black screen / no screen output after upgrading from 5.11 to 5.12
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 May '21

04 May '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185601 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185601#c5 Wolfgang Wander <wwcsmail(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wwcsmail(a)gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Wolfgang Wander <wwcsmail(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 849022 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=849022&action=edit dmesg with drm.debug=0x1e on DELL XPS 15 7590 (5.12.0 boot) Very similar behavior on a DELL XPS 15 7590 I went ahead and set the drm.debug boot flags as requested. Blacklisting nouveau or nvidia doesn't seem to help. nomodeset brings a non-graphical system up fine. The next attachment will be with 5.11.16 where the i915 driver and X11 work fine. Wolfgang -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1185199] yast2-iscsi-lio-server unusable - broken package resolution
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 May '21

04 May '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185199 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185199#c2 Ladislav Slez�k <lslezak(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Ladislav Slez�k <lslezak(a)suse.com> --- Fixed in yast2-iscsi-lio-server-4.4.1 (https://github.com/yast/yast-iscsi-lio-server/pull/109) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1185513] ACPI BIOS Error after upgrade to 5.12.0-1-default
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 May '21

04 May '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185513 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185513#c16 --- Comment #16 from robert spitzenpfeil <rs.opensuse(a)spitzenpfeil.org> --- It's very odd, as I had not experienced these error messages until a couple of updates before. I hope this doesn't affect any important functionality as a BIOS update for my machine is very unlikely. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1183057] VUL-0: monitoring-plugins-smart: unprivileged user can modify SMART settings due to insufficient input validation in check_smart.pl
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 May '21

04 May '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183057 Wolfgang Frisch <wolfgang.frisch(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nix(a)opensuse.org Assignee|nix(a)opensuse.org |lars.vogdt(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1185598] New: [YaST, Installer] YaST opens Error Popup about 'Invalid Value'
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 May '21

04 May '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185598 Bug ID: 1185598 Summary: [YaST, Installer] YaST opens Error Popup about 'Invalid Value' Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: All OS: SLES 15 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation Assignee: yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: eich(a)suse.com QA Contact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 849006 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=849006&action=edit Screen Shot YaST pops up an error message window (see attached screenshot). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1185513] ACPI BIOS Error after upgrade to 5.12.0-1-default
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 May '21

04 May '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185513 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185513#c15 --- Comment #15 from Joey Lee <jlee(a)suse.com> --- The real strange thing is in Anthony's ACPI tables. ACPI tables of his machine has _CPC method in processor 0 in ssdt15: Scope (\_PR.PR00) { Method (_CPC, 0, NotSerialized) // _CPC: Continuous Performance Control { If ((\_PR.CFGD & 0x01000000)) { Return (CPOC) /* External reference */ } Else { Return (CPC2) /* External reference */ } } } It looks no problem, then I used two version ACPICA to verify the execution of \_PR.PR01._CPC. I can _NOT_ reproduce AE_NOT_FOUND error. The execution of \_PR.PR01._CPC is success: - execute \_PR.PR01._CPC Evaluating \_PR.PR01._CPC Evaluation of \_PR.PR01._CPC returned object 0x18d6a90, external buffer length 3A8 [Package] Contains 21 Elements: [Integer] = 0000000000000015 ... Both of two version ACPICA (version 20210105 for v5.12 kernel and version 20201113 for v5.11 kernel) are success. Hi Anthony, Could you please confirm that you still see the AE_NOT_FOUND parsing error on _CPC with v5.12 kernel? Could you please help to attach dmesg log on bugzilla? Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1185518] Consider building Linux 5.12+ with PREEMPT flag on arches with STATIC_CALL
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 May '21

04 May '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185518 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185518#c2 Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbecker(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(fweisbecker@suse. | |com) | --- Comment #2 from Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbecker(a)suse.com> --- I think the current status is good. Just keep in mind that RCU will always use the RCU-preempt implementation in all dynamic preempt flavours now. I couldn't tell if that could result in a performance regression while switching from CONFIG_PREEMPT=n to "preempt=none". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0