May 2021 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1182098] VUL-0: CVE-2020-13576: gsoap: remote code execution via specially crafted SOAP request inside the WS-Addressing plugin
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 May '21

04 May '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182098 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182098#c4 --- Comment #4 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp(a)suse.de> --- openSUSE-SU-2021:0664-1: An update that fixes one vulnerability is now available. Category: security (important) Bug References: 1182098 CVE References: CVE-2020-13576 JIRA References: Sources used: openSUSE Backports SLE-15-SP2 (src): gsoap-2.8.102-bp152.2.4.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1185601] Black screen / no screen output after upgrading from 5.11 to 5.12
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 May '21

04 May '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185601 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185601#c10 --- Comment #10 from Wolfgang Wander <wwcsmail(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #8) > Thanks! Then could you open an upstream bug report, gitlab.freedesktop.org > Issues? > It's definitely worth for tracking in the upstream side. Will do. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1185601] Black screen / no screen output after upgrading from 5.11 to 5.12
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 May '21

04 May '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185601 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185601#c9 --- Comment #9 from Wolfgang Frisch <wolfgang.frisch(a)suse.com> --- I encountered the same problem on a Dell Precision 5530 with Intel graphics. Linux 5.11.16 is fine. Blank screen with 5.12. dmesg excerpt: >[ 115.111238] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.BRT6.LCD], AE_NOT_FOUND (20210105/psargs-330) >[ 115.111265] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP.BRT6 due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210105/psparse-529) >[ 115.111550] ACPI Error: Aborting method \EV5 due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210105/psparse-529) >[ 115.111722] ACPI Error: Aborting method \SMEE due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210105/psparse-529) >[ 115.111883] ACPI Error: Aborting method \SMIE due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210105/psparse-529) >[ 115.112042] ACPI Error: Aborting method \NEVT due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210105/psparse-529) >[ 115.112201] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPCB.ECDV._Q66 due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210105/psparse-529) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1185518] Consider building Linux 5.12+ with PREEMPT flag on arches with STATIC_CALL
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 May '21

04 May '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185518 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185518#c6 Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbecker(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(fweisbecker@suse. | |com) | --- Comment #6 from Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbecker(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Michal Hocko from comment #5) > I do not remember the exact form this got in the end but do we have a way to > have PREEMPT_NONE behavior by default without adding a kernel command line > option with PREEMPT=y? No indeed and other people outside recently asked me for that. I can submit a patch for that if you like. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1185601] Black screen / no screen output after upgrading from 5.11 to 5.12
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 May '21

04 May '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185601 Wolfgang Frisch <wolfgang.frisch(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wolfgang.frisch(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1185518] Consider building Linux 5.12+ with PREEMPT flag on arches with STATIC_CALL
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 May '21

04 May '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185518 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185518#c5 Michal Hocko <mhocko(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(fweisbecker@suse. | |com) --- Comment #5 from Michal Hocko <mhocko(a)suse.com> --- I do not remember the exact form this got in the end but do we have a way to have PREEMPT_NONE behavior by default without adding a kernel command line option with PREEMPT=y? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1184808] New: AUDIT-0: Shipping keys via repos
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 May '21

04 May '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1184808 Bug ID: 1184808 Summary: AUDIT-0: Shipping keys via repos Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.3 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Security Assignee: security-team(a)suse.de Reporter: jsegitz(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: d_werner(a)gmx.net, guillaume.gardet(a)arm.com, lubos.kocman(a)suse.com, mlin(a)suse.com, ro(a)suse.de Depends on: 1184326 Found By: --- Blocker: --- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1184326 +++ Details are in the original bug. copy paste from Michael: I'd be happy if we now catch the momentum and get a solution for this quite common issue (a repo that want's to ship additional keys). It would IMO be a good step forward especially for 3rd parties, if they are enabled to ship their keys in way zypp recognizes them when the repo is added. This is an issue for Leap 15.3 because of the SLES key, but they want a more general mechanism. As this is a very sensitive topic we should review this first -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 1185518] Consider building Linux 5.12+ with PREEMPT flag on arches with STATIC_CALL
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 May '21

04 May '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185518 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185518#c4 --- Comment #4 from Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbecker(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #3) > OK, then we might want to check the performance tests at first. > Adding Mel to Cc. > > For the reference, I built test kernel packages in OBS home:tiwai:bsc1185518 > repo. They'll be available at: > http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/tiwai:/bsc1185518/standard/ > > Also available in IBS home:tiwai:bsc1185518 repo, too. Excellent! Thanks a lot! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1185518] Consider building Linux 5.12+ with PREEMPT flag on arches with STATIC_CALL
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 May '21

04 May '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185518 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185518#c3 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mgorman(a)suse.com --- Comment #3 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- OK, then we might want to check the performance tests at first. Adding Mel to Cc. For the reference, I built test kernel packages in OBS home:tiwai:bsc1185518 repo. They'll be available at: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/tiwai:/bsc1185518/standard/ Also available in IBS home:tiwai:bsc1185518 repo, too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1184339] select() no longer modifies timeout value
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 May '21

04 May '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184339 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184339#c20 Andreas Schwab <schwab(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #20 from Andreas Schwab <schwab(a)suse.com> --- Fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0