October 2021 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1191086] New: open-iscsi: finish UsrMerge, install to /usr
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 11 Oct '21

11 Oct '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191086 Bug ID: 1191086 Summary: open-iscsi: finish UsrMerge, install to /usr Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: lduncan(a)suse.com Reporter: lnussel(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: hare(a)suse.com Blocks: 1191054 Found By: --- Blocker: --- Following up on the discussion on the Factory list https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/message… All packages installing files into /bin, /sbin, /lib and /lib64 should change the location to the counterpart in /usr instead. Please consider doing that for open-iscsi. If open-iscsi still needs to build for released distros you may keep the legacy locations within a "%if %suse_version < 1550" block of course. If you do that, please do *NOT* install symlinks from/to /usr as it was done with some packages in the past. Move the files in question instead. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1188896] "BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:00000000e555b579 type:MM_FILEPAGES val:-256" during build of cross-epiphany-gcc11-bootstrap
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 11 Oct '21

11 Oct '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188896 Ihno Krumreich <ihno(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugproxy(a)us.ibm.com Flags| |needinfo?(bugproxy(a)us.ibm.c | |om) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1191440] Repository certificate seems to have expired
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 11 Oct '21

11 Oct '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191440 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191440#c5 --- Comment #5 from Roger Green <rogvespa(a)outlook.com> --- Just to confirm that the update to ca-certificates-mozilla did fix the issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1188689] Allow easy setting up wireless network when installing and upgrading
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 11 Oct '21

11 Oct '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188689 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188689#c5 --- Comment #5 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp(a)suse.de> --- openSUSE-RU-2021:1340-1: An update that has two recommended fixes can now be installed. Category: recommended (moderate) Bug References: 1186593,1188689 CVE References: JIRA References: Sources used: openSUSE Leap 15.3 (src): skelcd-control-openSUSE-15.3.6-lp153.2.5.1, skelcd-control-openSUSE-promo-15.3.6-lp153.2.5.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1186593] Leap 15.3 is missing Backports update and SLE Update repo definitions
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 11 Oct '21

11 Oct '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186593 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186593#c53 --- Comment #53 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp(a)suse.de> --- openSUSE-RU-2021:1340-1: An update that has two recommended fixes can now be installed. Category: recommended (moderate) Bug References: 1186593,1188689 CVE References: JIRA References: Sources used: openSUSE Leap 15.3 (src): skelcd-control-openSUSE-15.3.6-lp153.2.5.1, skelcd-control-openSUSE-promo-15.3.6-lp153.2.5.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1190871] Higher than normal frequency for idle
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 11 Oct '21

11 Oct '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190871 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190871#c15 Giovanni Gherdovich <giovanni.gherdovich(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #15 from Giovanni Gherdovich <giovanni.gherdovich(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Anthony Agelastos from comment #13) > [...] > Thank you for such a wonderful post. Thanks :) Below I'm reporting some of the turbostat columns, referring to the "overview output lines" (those having a dash "-" instead of the Core/CPU number). All parameters are nominal, no CPU is going faster than expected or wasting energy. See below how "Avg_MHz" is in the single or two digits (indicating that the CPUs are mostly idle), and that is confirmed by the "Busy%" column, always around 1% or less except for a couple of readings. "Bzy_MHz", discussed previously, is uninteresting for this analysis but reported for completeness, as it's similar to what lscpu would show. Note that lscpu would give Bzy_MHz for the first CPU, CPU#0, while below we have the average over the entire system. Temperature is around 30 C and power consuption is ~7W (this specific CPU is expected to consume around 95W under load, see https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/126684/intel-core-i787… On this basis, I'm going to close this report, everything seems to work fine. Feel free to reopen if anything changes. Cheers, $ grep ^- turbostat.log | \ awk 'BEGIN {printf "%s\t%s\t%s\t%s\t%s\n", "Avg_MHz", "Busy%", "Bzy_MHz", "PkgTmp", "PkgWatt"} {printf "%2d\t%5.2f\t%5d\t%3d\t%5.2f\n", $3, $4, $5, $33, $44}' Avg_MHz Busy% Bzy_MHz PkgTmp PkgWatt 35 1.40 2492 31 8.04 11 0.87 1275 31 6.83 10 0.84 1177 30 6.80 10 0.82 1197 30 6.75 10 0.85 1162 30 6.77 10 0.86 1167 30 6.81 10 0.84 1174 31 6.86 10 0.85 1167 30 6.85 10 0.87 1156 31 6.85 10 0.85 1156 31 6.85 10 0.84 1182 30 6.85 10 0.84 1169 30 6.83 10 0.86 1168 30 6.85 10 0.84 1181 31 6.83 10 0.86 1177 31 6.85 10 0.84 1183 31 6.84 10 0.84 1188 30 6.85 10 0.85 1180 30 6.81 10 0.84 1171 30 6.81 10 0.82 1190 30 6.73 10 0.84 1170 31 6.84 10 0.86 1163 31 6.82 10 0.84 1174 30 6.82 21 2.25 937 30 7.06 9 0.83 1064 31 6.72 9 0.82 1053 31 6.68 10 0.84 1177 30 6.76 14 1.39 1031 31 6.87 89 10.28 867 32 7.70 65 8.12 800 31 4.99 27 3.23 829 31 4.40 8 0.86 984 30 5.85 9 0.85 1075 31 6.74 10 0.82 1189 31 6.77 24 2.63 920 31 7.04 28 2.86 962 31 7.11 10 1.30 800 30 6.69 10 0.83 1191 31 6.75 10 0.87 1179 30 6.77 10 0.84 1187 31 6.75 10 0.83 1199 31 6.75 10 0.83 1188 31 6.73 10 0.84 1176 30 6.74 10 0.82 1192 31 6.76 10 0.84 1177 31 6.78 10 0.82 1183 30 6.73 10 0.83 1184 31 6.77 10 0.83 1200 31 6.76 10 0.84 1185 30 6.77 10 0.82 1202 30 6.75 10 0.82 1182 31 6.74 10 0.82 1189 31 6.77 10 0.83 1186 30 6.79 28 2.36 1196 30 7.39 9 0.81 1072 31 6.76 9 0.82 1070 30 6.71 10 0.84 1189 31 6.78 10 0.82 1187 31 6.76 10 0.87 1178 30 6.81 10 0.84 1168 31 6.78 10 0.83 1181 31 6.74 10 0.85 1170 31 6.79 10 0.83 1189 30 6.79 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1191507] VUL-0: CVE-2021-41133: flatpak: Sandbox bypass via recent VFS-manipulating syscalls
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 11 Oct '21

11 Oct '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191507 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191507#c3 --- Comment #3 from Robert Frohl <rfrohl(a)suse.com> --- Thanks for opening the bug Andreas! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1191507] VUL-0: CVE-2021-41133: flatpak: Sandbox bypass via recent VFS-manipulating syscalls
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 11 Oct '21

11 Oct '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191507 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191507#c2 --- Comment #2 from Robert Frohl <rfrohl(a)suse.com> --- tracking as affected for now: - SUSE:SLE-15:Update/flatpak - SUSE:SLE-15-SP1:Update/flatpak - SUSE:SLE-15-SP2:Update/flatpak -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1191507] VUL-0: CVE-2021-41133: flatpak: Sandbox bypass via recent VFS-manipulating syscalls
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 11 Oct '21

11 Oct '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191507 Robert Frohl <rfrohl(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gnome-bugs(a)suse.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1184890] JeOS-efi image is not resized when booted on real hardware
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 11 Oct '21

11 Oct '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184890 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184890#c6 Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fvogt(a)suse.com --- Comment #6 from Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> --- //lib/kiwi-partitions-lib.sh@298(disk_has_unallocated_space): '[' gpt = gpt ']' //lib/kiwi-partitions-lib.sh@305(disk_has_unallocated_space): sgdisk --verify /dev/mmcblk0 //lib/kiwi-partitions-lib.sh@305(disk_has_unallocated_space): grep -q 'end of the disk' //lib/kiwi-partitions-lib.sh@402(resize_wanted): info 'Disk geometry did not change' //lib/dracut-lib.sh@89(info): echo 'Disk geometry did not change' Disk geometry did not change Apparently the secondary GPT header is at the end already. What's the output of "sgdisk --verify"? Maybe it's happy with an older leftover GPT header at the end? Or something during boot (or previously, FW?) resized the GPT disk already. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0