https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173550
Marcus Meissner <meissner(a)suse.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |meissner(a)suse.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172992
Alynx Zhou <alynx.zhou(a)suse.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |alynx.zhou(a)suse.com
Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |tchvatal(a)suse.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084631https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084631#c4
jun wang <junguo.wang(a)suse.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |junguo.wang(a)suse.com
--- Comment #4 from jun wang <junguo.wang(a)suse.com> ---
I am testing nasm update, and when checking the url
https://build.suse.de/build/SUSE:Maintenance:15602/SUSE_SLE-15_Update/x86_6…,
I get many these output:
[ 95s] cd test && perl -I./perllib -I. performtest.pl --nasm=../nasm *.asm
[ 95s] Can't compare at _file_/bin file stdout
[ 95s] Can't compare at _version/version file stdout
[ 95s] Can't compare at a32offs/unoptimized file a32offs.bin
[ 95s] Can't compare at a32offs/optimized file a32offs.bin
is this OK?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161036
Bug ID: 1161036
Summary: pk-offline-update reports success despite failed
update
Classification: openSUSE
Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed
Version: Current
Hardware: Other
OS: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority: P5 - None
Component: GNOME
Assignee: gnome-bugs(a)suse.de
Reporter: martin.wilck(a)suse.com
QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de
Found By: ---
Blocker: ---
End user experience:
- Klick "restart and update" in GNOME Software
- Confirm restart
- System boots
- After a few minutes, system boots again
- Logging in and restarting GNOME softwrare, the same list of updates is
displayed again, with the same "Restart and Update" button
- This can be repeated
journalctl -b -1 shows this:
> Jan 16 08:37:49 apollon pk-offline-update[1406]: status wait
> Jan 16 08:37:49 apollon pk-offline-update[1406]: status setup
> Jan 16 08:37:52 apollon pk-offline-update[1406]: status finished
> Jan 16 08:37:52 apollon PackageKit[1449]: update-packages transaction /1_ebebddca from uid 0 finished with failed after 2901ms
> Jan 16 08:37:52 apollon pk-offline-update[1406]: writing failed results
> Jan 16 08:37:52 apollon pk-offline-update[1406]: failed to update system: There is no update candidate for post-build-checks-84.88+git>
> Jan 16 08:37:52 apollon systemd[1]: systemd-rfkill.service: Succeeded.
> Jan 16 08:38:02 apollon pk-offline-update[1406]: rebooting
> Jan 16 08:38:02 apollon pk-offline-update[1406]: sent mode to plymouth 'shutdown'
> Jan 16 08:38:02 apollon pk-offline-update[1406]: sent msg to plymouth 'Rebooting after installing updates…'
> Jan 16 08:38:02 apollon systemd[1]: packagekit-offline-update.service: Succeeded.
> Jan 16 08:38:02 apollon systemd[1]: Stopped Update the operating system whilst offline.
So, pk-offline-update returns Success status even though it failed to do the
update.
The actual update problem was due to a version "correction" in
post-build-checks that would cause the package to be downgraded:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r95 | dimstar_suse | 2020-01-10 16:47:24 | 7568a213422b18c1c6714e41fb98c0b2 | 84.87+git20200110.2d02f07 | rq762807
>
> - Update to version 84.87+git20200110.2d02f07:
> * Tweaks to make rpm-ndb build
> * Detect name of coreutils package and don't remove it
> - restore correct version
installed version: 84.88+git20190716.5a0e034-1.1
candidate version: 84.87+git20200110.2d02f07-1.1
I have set "solver.dupAllowDowngrade = true" in zypp.conf.
If I run "zypper dup -D -y --details, I get this:
> ...
> The following package is going to be downgraded:
> post-build-checks
> 84.88+git20190716.5a0e034-1.1 -> 84.87+git20200110.2d02f07-1.1
> noarch
> openSUSE-Tumbleweed-Oss
> openSUSE
> ...
> 544 packages to upgrade, 1 to downgrade, 10 new, 3 to remove, 1 to change arch.
> Overall download size: 0 B. Already cached: 913.1 MiB. After the operation, additional 281.8 MiB will be used.
>
> Note: System reboot required.
> Continue? [y/n/v/...? shows all options] (y): y
>
> Checking for file conflicts: [...........done]
So, zypper handles this situation just fine, and finds no other conflicts.
Arguably the PackageKit zypp plugin should be able to deal with this rather
trivial conflict automatically. But that's not my main point: The real problem
is that the error didn't propagate to GNOME software, which thus offers the
same update again and again, providing no clue to the end user that something
went wrong, let alone what it was.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173550
Bug ID: 1173550
Summary: zypper dumps core on specific subcommands lu, lp, pch
Classification: openSUSE
Product: openSUSE Distribution
Version: Leap 15.1
Hardware: x86-64
OS: SUSE Other
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority: P5 - None
Component: libzypp
Assignee: zypp-maintainers(a)suse.de
Reporter: dcfleck(a)protonmail.ch
QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de
Found By: ---
Blocker: ---
System: Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E531, OpenSUSE Leap 15.1 upgraded from 42.3.
Problem: zypper dumps core when using any of the subcommands: lu, lp, pch.
Error message is identical for each of the 3 cases:
# zypper -vv lu
Verbosity: 3
Initializing Target
Checking whether to refresh metadata for Non-OSS Repository
Checking whether to refresh metadata for Main Repository
Checking whether to refresh metadata for Main Update Repository
Checking whether to refresh metadata for Update Repository (Non-Oss)
Loading repository data...
Reading installed packages...
Force resolution: No
/usr/include/c++/7/bits/stl_vector.h:797: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::reference
std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator[](std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::size_type) [with
_Tp = std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>; _Alloc =
std::allocator<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> >; std::vector<_Tp,
_Alloc>::reference = std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>&; std::vector<_Tp,
_Alloc>::size_type = long unsigned int]: Assertion '__builtin_expect(__n <
this->size(), true)' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
# zypper -V
zypper 1.14.37
# tail /var/log/zypper.log
2020-06-30 18:47:00 <1> moira2.sourballs.org(18053) [libsolv++]
PoolImpl.cc(logSat):123 done solving.
2020-06-30 18:47:00 <1> moira2.sourballs.org(18053) [libsolv++]
PoolImpl.cc(logSat):123
2020-06-30 18:47:00 <1> moira2.sourballs.org(18053) [libsolv++]
PoolImpl.cc(logSat):123 solver took 580 ms
2020-06-30 18:47:00 <1> moira2.sourballs.org(18053) [libsolv++]
PoolImpl.cc(logSat):123 final solver statistics: 0 problems, 0 learned rules, 0
unsolvable
2020-06-30 18:47:00 <1> moira2.sourballs.org(18053) [libsolv++]
PoolImpl.cc(logSat):123 solver_solve took 796 ms
2020-06-30 18:47:00 <1> moira2.sourballs.org(18053) [zypp::solver]
SATResolver.cc(establish):222 Establish DONE
2020-06-30 18:47:00 <1> moira2.sourballs.org(18053) [zypp]
TargetImpl.cc(updateFileContent):786 updating
'/var/lib/zypp/LastDistributionFlavor' content.
2020-06-30 18:47:00 <1> moira2.sourballs.org(18053) [zypp]
TargetImpl.cc(load):1177 Target loaded: 3376 resolvables
2020-06-30 18:47:00 <1> moira2.sourballs.org(18053) [zypper]
repos.cc(load_resolvables):1759 Done loading resolvables
2020-06-30 18:47:00 <1> moira2.sourballs.org(18053) [zypper]
basecommand.cc(defaultSystemSetup):199 -------------- Calling SAT Solver to
establish the PPP status -------------------
[end of file]
Not sure what other information would be helpful. I assume the problem is
something in the machine's environment interacting badly with zypper, but I
don't know what zypper is looking for at this point in the code that would
cause this error. Because it is machine-specific, I don't really know what
would need to be done to a machine to reproduce the error (I have a second
identical laptop that does not have the problem).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.