June 2020 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1172302] The Mesa-libGL-devel-32bit package is missing
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Jun '20

03 Jun '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172302 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172302#c2 --- Comment #2 from Marcus Meissner <meissner(a)suse.com> --- Created attachment 838446 --> http://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=838446&action=edit xx.pat would suzggest this patch against baselibs.conf this forces inclusion of the pklgconfig files, so getting the -devel-32bit packages generated, or a empty README (If the baselibs has no files, it will just not be generated, which was the case here) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1161347] [TRACKER] Update Guile to version 3.0
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Jun '20

03 Jun '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161347 Martin Liška <martin.liska(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |1172430 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1172328] Yast2 new directory server
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Jun '20

03 Jun '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172328 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172328#c3 Michal Filka <mfilka(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pjaouen(a)ponctey.fr Flags| |needinfo?(pjaouen(a)ponctey.f | |r) --- Comment #3 from Michal Filka <mfilka(a)suse.com> --- Could you please attach complete yast logs. The best would be to use save_y2logs tool to collect them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1172300] New: None of the applications are grouped into app folders
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Jun '20

03 Jun '20

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1172300 Bug ID: 1172300 Summary: None of the applications are grouped into app folders Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.2 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: GNOME Assignee: gnome-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: badshah400(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 838365 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=838365&action=edit Five pages of apps with too many of them YaST Leap 152 Build 665 None of the applications are grouped into app folders, making the application overview messed up with too many apps -- including numerous YaST modules -- at first glance. This is a regression compared to 15.1 where the default installation had the YaST modules grouped in an app folder of their own and so were Utilities and Sundry. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 1172390] Runtime error when loading module 'Bootloader'
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Jun '20

03 Jun '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172390 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172390#c4 Josef Reidinger <jreidinger(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |azouhr(a)opensuse.org Flags|needinfo?(jreidinger(a)suse.c |needinfo?(azouhr(a)opensuse.o |om) |rg) --- Comment #4 from Josef Reidinger <jreidinger(a)suse.com> --- for me it looks like system ruby version is not switched. Bootloader has dependency on cfa grub2 https://github.com/yast/yast-bootloader/blob/master/package/yast2-bootloade… Can you please inspect in openqa image what is output of ls -l /usr/lib*/ruby/gems/*/gems/cfa_grub2-*/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1172417] MicroOS rpi2 images: serial console on wrong tty
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Jun '20

03 Jun '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172417 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172417#c1 Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> --- Both my RPi2 running ancient TW from 2016 and the ARM JeOS use AMA0, so it's probably correct. sr 811010 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1172381] dracut builds incorrect boot arguments
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Jun '20

03 Jun '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172381 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172381#c2 Josef Reidinger <jreidinger(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(jreidinger(a)suse.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Josef Reidinger <jreidinger(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Michal Filka from comment #1) > the only difference i can see is that in first case you have (In reply to > Per Jessen from comment #0) > > When I install TW on NFS, the system never boots the fist time. I always > > have to reboot the installer and rebuild the initrd. To me it looks like a > > lack of /etc/resolv.conf when the first initrd is being built. > > > > Built during installation: > > root=nfs4:rootserver:/srv/nfsroot/mole28:rw,relatime,vers=4.1,rsize=131072, > > wsize=131072,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp6,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys, > > clientaddr=2a03:7520:4c68:1:ff99:ffff:0:93cd,local_lock=none,addr=2a03:7520: > > 4c68:1::128 > > ifname=eth0:00:30:48:d3:75:74 ip=eth0:static > > > > this "static" looks weird to me. AFAIK ip boot param doesn't know such > keyword. Moreover the static configuration is not provided at all. > > @Josef: > are we responsible for creating kernel boot params list in this case? well, yes. Bootloader copy installation kernel parameters to target system parameters. But if I get issue, it is about missing resolv.conf in dracut, maybe issue is that we run dracut in target system and that system maybe missing resolv.conf which lives in during installation in insts-sys and not target system? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1162283] rust emits SSE2 for i586 (SIGILL)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Jun '20

03 Jun '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162283 Alynx Zhou <alynx.zhou(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alynx.zhou(a)suse.com Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |federico(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1166342] Harmonize kernel modules in JeOS leap 15.1 with TW and leap 15.2
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Jun '20

03 Jun '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166342 Alynx Zhou <alynx.zhou(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alynx.zhou(a)suse.com Component|Other |Kernel Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1172413] ignition: better handling of missing config
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Jun '20

03 Jun '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172413 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172413#c1 --- Comment #1 from Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk(a)suse.com> --- I don't like that at all, and no other system or distribution is doing this. This would also mean, that we need two configs, one where a root login (password or ssh key) needs to be provided and another, where not. I don't see a benefit for this complexness. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0