September 2018 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1055956] New: QEMU snapshot not loaded despite savevm being executed properly
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Sep '18

03 Sep '18

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1055956 Bug ID: 1055956 Summary: QEMU snapshot not loaded despite savevm being executed properly Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: aarch64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Virtualization:Tools Assignee: virt-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: santiago.zarate(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- After looking at the openQA job https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/473434 that failed right after the vlc test, the following things can be seen on the os-autoinst-log.txt file: > 18:12:38.2452 22133 ||| finished reboot_gnome x11 at 2017-08-24 18:12:38 (89 s) > 18:12:38.2466 22133 Creating a VM snapshot lastgood > 18:12:38.2483 22133 ||| starting desktop_mainmenu tests/x11/desktop_mainmenu.pm > at 2017-08-24 18:12:38 Which clearly shows that a snapshot was created after a test marked as a milestone, ran successfully (https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/473434#step/reboot_gnome/6) but later, after the VLC module is reached, the test dies once the vlc module fails and OpenQA backend tries to load the "lastgood" snapshot that should have been created, but qemu reports that it's not there: > 18:42:25.6524 22133 Loading a VM snapshot lastgood > DIE Could not load snapshot 'lastgood': loadvm lastgood > Device 'hd1' does not have the requested snapshot 'lastgood' at > /usr/lib/os-autoinst/backend/qemu.pm line 257. I don't think it might be consequence of bsc#1048296 as the behavior is completely different. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 1076219] Pkg aspell-de is missing for x86_64 tumbleweed
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Sep '18

03 Sep '18

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076219 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076219#c2 Tomáš Chvátal <tchvatal(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |harald.achitz(a)gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Tomáš Chvátal <tchvatal(a)suse.com> --- *** Bug 1106844 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1106844] package aspell-de is missing
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Sep '18

03 Sep '18

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106844 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106844#c2 Tomáš Chvátal <tchvatal(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Tomáš Chvátal <tchvatal(a)suse.com> --- Aspell is not default anywhere, we prefer and provide only hunspell spellchecking everywhere. But still it is provided and here it seems like bug in OBS so lets just keep one bug only for the issue. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1076219 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1106850] xfig crashes if noto-sans-cjk-fonts are installed
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Sep '18

03 Sep '18

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106850 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106850#c5 Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(sndirsch(a)suse.com | |) | --- Comment #5 from Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch(a)suse.com> --- I could reproduce after installing noto-sans-cjk-fonts. Works again after uninstalling these fonts. You may need to run /usr/sbin/fonts-config -f -v after (un)installing the fonts. AFAIK xfig doesn't use fontconfig at all, i.e. serverside font rendering only including fontsets. I'm not aware of any changes there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1089408] Automatic mounting of external exfat volume results in wrong permissions
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Sep '18

03 Sep '18

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089408 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089408#c18 Matthias Gerstner <matthias.gerstner(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias.gerstner(a)suse.com Flags|needinfo?(security-team@sus | |e.de) | --- Comment #18 from Matthias Gerstner <matthias.gerstner(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Thomas Blume from comment #8) > Security team, could you please take a look at the potential security risk > outlined in comment#5 and give an assessment? Well this is a complex topic as you all already pointed out in the discussions. Basically I would say that plugging in an untrusted storage device is an issue to begin with. There are attack vectors on the kernel side of things or on the low file system side. So the files that appear in the file system are actually only one of the last (and most obvious) layers where security is concerned. Having all files mounted executable gives more room for undesired execution e.g. by mistyping a command line or simply double clicking in a file manager (which, again, depends on the file manager implementation, what actually is executed). We also have things like indexing programs that process e.g. images and produce thumbnails of them. So even without executable bits there is already attack surface. For me personally the question has always been whether it is of any use to have FAT files mounted executable. If they're foreign executables from e.g. a Windows system then I can't execute them directly anyways. If they're actual Linux binaries or scripts ... I personally would like to use a file system that supports basic UNIX permissions. Also for me it would be rather uncommon to execute programs from a removable device at all. But that is all a matter of personal style and use cases. Still I somehow have the feeling that the use case of wanting to execute something from a removable device is not something that happens often. Based on the observation that there are a lot of other security issues that hit when mounting an untrusted device I am somewhat inclined to follow the best usability / user experience in this case. Whatever that would be ;-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1106369] oops when reading /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/vmentry_l1d_flush
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Sep '18

03 Sep '18

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106369 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106369#c6 --- Comment #6 from Michal Hocko <mhocko(a)suse.com> --- cherry picked to SLE11-SP3-TD as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1106837] Empty service warning for new repository in YaST
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Sep '18

03 Sep '18

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106837 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106837#c2 Ladislav Slezák <lslezak(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P3 - Medium Status|NEW |IN_PROGRESS Assignee|yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de |lslezak(a)suse.com --- Comment #2 from Ladislav Slezák <lslezak(a)suse.com> --- Yes, there is the nil vs. "" issue... I'll fix that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1106917] python2-backports.ssl_match_hostname: ImportError: No module named backports.ssl_match_hostname
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Sep '18

03 Sep '18

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106917 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106917#c1 --- Comment #1 from Tomáš Chvátal <tchvatal(a)suse.com> --- The package python2-backports provides the symlink for the __init__.py here: rpm -ql python2-backports /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/backports /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/backports/__init__.py /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/backports/__init__.pyc /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/backports/__init__.pyo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1106850] xfig crashes if noto-sans-cjk-fonts are installed
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Sep '18

03 Sep '18

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106850 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106850#c4 --- Comment #4 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner(a)suse.com> --- ... and value of the environment variable XMODIFIERS as shown by echo $XMODIFIERS would be very interesting ... also the values of font config environment variables as shown by echo ${!FONTCONFIG_*} ${!FC_*} which would be something like for var in ${!FONTCONFIG_*} ${!FC_*}; do eval echo $var=\$$var done -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1104682] Partially working "Really abort?" dialog in YaST2
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Sep '18

03 Sep '18

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104682 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104682#c2 Ladislav Slezák <lslezak(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #2 from Ladislav Slezák <lslezak(a)suse.com> --- I tried to reproduce the problem in the latest build (openSUSE-Leap-15.1-DVD-x86_64-Build297.3-Media.iso) and it worked fine for me, the Alt+Y keyboard shortcut properly aborted the samba server module as expected. If you can still reproduce it in the latest build then reopen the bug. Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0