openSUSE Bugs October 2016

bugs@lists.opensuse.org

1 participants
3919 discussions

[Bug 953735] New: Change libqt5-creator name to qt5-creator
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Apr '22

03 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=953735 Bug ID: 953735 Summary: Change libqt5-creator name to qt5-creator Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: 2015* Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: ronisbr(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hi! In Tumbleweed, I have been using the package qt-creator to develop Qt applications for a long time. I have always complained about the old version, since qt-creator is 3.2.2 and the newest version available is 3.5.1. However, it turns out that the newest version is already available in Tumbleweed (and in Leap) under the name libqt5-creator. Is there any good reason to name the package as libqt5-creator? I think this is very confusing. Since it has a lib* in the name, I did not even look at the description, so I was using a very old version all the time. Thus, I am wondering if it is possible to change the name of libqt5-creator to qt5-creator or something else. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 4

[Bug 924591] New: Apache2 doesn't start with faulty config, prob from yast
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 14 Mar '22

14 Mar '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=924591 Bug ID: 924591 Summary: Apache2 doesn't start with faulty config, prob from yast Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Factory Version: 201503* Hardware: armv7 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: YaST2 Assignee: yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: volker3204(a)paradise.net.nz QA Contact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- Running yast http-server module, making basically no changes to get basic config. No vhosts, ssl, etc. Btw a server name can't be entered, the value is going to /dev/null. Starting apache gives: Mar 27 14:37:35 cubie start_apache2[9361]: Module "authz_default" is not installed, ignoring. Mar 27 14:37:35 cubie start_apache2[9361]: Check the APACHE_MODULES setting in /etc/sysconfig/apache2. Mar 27 14:37:35 cubie start_apache2[9361]: AH00526: Syntax error on line 10 of /etc/apache2/mod_status.conf: Mar 27 14:37:35 cubie start_apache2[9361]: Invalid command 'Require', perhaps misspelled or defined by a module not included in the server configuration Mar 27 14:37:36 cubie start_apache2[9378]: Module "authz_default" is not installed, ignoring. Mar 27 14:37:36 cubie start_apache2[9378]: Check the APACHE_MODULES setting in /etc/sysconfig/apache2. Mar 27 14:37:36 cubie start_apache2[9378]: AH00526: Syntax error on line 10 of /etc/apache2/mod_status.conf: Mar 27 14:37:36 cubie start_apache2[9378]: Invalid command 'Require', perhaps misspelled or defined by a module not included in the server configuration Mar 27 14:37:36 cubie systemd[1]: Failed to start The Apache Webserver. In the yast http-server server-modules tab authz_default is listed with a description of "unknown", i.e. none. The module does not exist on disk! Editing /etc/sysconfig/apache2 adding authz_core to APACHE_MODULES makes authz_core also be shown with a description of "unknown". systemctl restart apache2 is now successful. This bnc:835484#6 basically says yast http-server module is foobared, so it's probably best to uninstall it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 4

[Bug 918705] New: alpine locking failure (against procmail) leads to mail corruption
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 11 Mar '22

11 Mar '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918705 Bug ID: 918705 Summary: alpine locking failure (against procmail) leads to mail corruption Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Factory Version: 201502* Hardware: x86-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: gp(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- This is something I started to see a bit ago, and since it now happened twice today I figured I'd report it. When I obtain mail via fetchmail, using procmail as the delivery agent, occasionally I get corrupted mails like the following (in mbox format): ==== snip ==== >From gp Thu Feb 19 18:56:54 2015 Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:56:00 +0100 Subject: AW: Re: Your help needed: Fwd: Comment opportunity: Software Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 9310 definedstorage Subject: AW: Re: Your help needed: Fwd: Comment opportunity: Software definedstorage References: <54E302D90200006F00158C8B(a)suse.com> <54E2D72A0200002B000A1B55(a)suse.com> <54E339FA0200006F00158DBD(a)suse.com> <54E2D7DE0200002B000A1B68(a)suse.com> <alpine.LSU.2.11.1502191739290.2252(a)ghan.fvgr> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1502191739290.2252(a)ghan.fvgr> Message-ID: <54E623B70200006F001594A6(a)suse.com> From: ... To: "Gerald Pfeifer" <gp(a)suse.com> ==== snap ==== This does not happen daily, and I believe it happens especially when I have been offline for several hours and a few dozen e-mails are delivered at once (though this specific case was not that). The same configuration had been working for years without ever showing this problem, and it looks like looking on the Alpine side (or procmail, though less likely I guess, since it essentially only reads :0 INBOX ) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 7

[Bug 906594] New: Apper showing wrong package description
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=906594 Bug ID: 906594 Summary: Apper showing wrong package description Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Factory Version: NO 13.2 BUGS!! Hardware: x86-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE4 Applications Assignee: kde-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: erwin.vandevelde(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Apper shows the package's description when clicking on it, but only for the first package you click on this is done correctly. Apper shows the same description again and again for each other package you click on. Versions: apper 0.9.1-2.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 942751] New: python3 test / missing __main__ module
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=942751 Bug ID: 942751 Summary: python3 test / missing __main__ module Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Factory Version: 201505* Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: myemailu(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- When running python 3 -m test the output is: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib64/python3.4/runpy.py", line 170, in _run_module_as_main "__main__", mod_spec) File "/usr/lib64/python3.4/runpy.py", line 85, in _run_code exec(code, run_globals) File "/usr/lib64/python3.4/_import_failed/test.py", line 21, in <module> Please file a bug on the SUSE Bugzilla.""".format(__name__)) ImportError: Module '__main__' is not installed. It is supposed to be part of python3 distribution, but missing from failed import map. Please file a bug on the SUSE Bugzilla. I'm using python3 on Tumbleweed rpm -qi python3 Name : python3 Version : 3.4.3 Release : 4.1 Architecture: x86_64 Install Date: Mi 29 Jul 2015 22:03:48 CEST Group : Development/Languages/Python Size : 2996719 License : Python-2.0 Signature : RSA/SHA256, Di 28 Jul 2015 11:49:27 CEST, Key ID b88b2fd43dbdc284 Source RPM : python3-3.4.3-4.1.src.rpm Build Date : Di 28 Jul 2015 11:49:14 CEST Build Host : build75 Relocations : (not relocatable) Packager : http://bugs.opensuse.org Vendor : openSUSE URL : http://www.python.org/ Summary : Python3 Interpreter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 26

[Bug 997614] New: python's platform.linux_distribution() doesn't understand /etc/os-release
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997614 Bug ID: 997614 Summary: python's platform.linux_distribution() doesn't understand /etc/os-release Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: tserong(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- > cat /etc/SuSE-release cat: /etc/SuSE-release: No such file or directory > cat /etc/os-release NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed" # VERSION="20160831" ID=opensuse ID_LIKE="suse" VERSION_ID="20160831" PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed" ANSI_COLOR="0;32" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:opensuse:tumbleweed:20160831" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.opensuse.org" HOME_URL="https://www.opensuse.org/" > python -c 'import platform ; print platform.linux_distribution()' ('', '', '') That's odd. Python doesn't know what distro we're running on. But, on an earlier Tumbleweed release: > cat /etc/SuSE-release openSUSE 20160701 (x86_64) VERSION = 20160701 CODENAME = Tumbleweed # /etc/SuSE-release is deprecated and will be removed in the future, use /etc/os-release instead > cat /etc/os-release NAME=openSUSE VERSION="Tumbleweed" VERSION_ID="20160701" PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160701) (x86_64)" ID=opensuse ANSI_COLOR="0;32" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:opensuse:opensuse:20160701" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.opensuse.org" HOME_URL="https://www.opensuse.org/" ID_LIKE="suse" > python -c 'import platform ; print platform.linux_distribution()' ('openSUSE ', '20160701', 'x86_64') Turns out the file matching in /usr/lib64/python2.7/platform.py (line 323+) is looking for files named /(\w+)[-_](release|version)/, so it picks up "os-release", and decides _distname is "os", which *isn't* in _supported_dists (_supported_dists includes "SuSE", "debian", "fedora", etc. but no generic "os"). So, as we apparently no longer ship SuSE-release, and there's no other release-like files to parse, and we end up with platform.linux_distribution() having no idea what's going on. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 34

[Bug 917759] New: osc fails with a python exception
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917759 Bug ID: 917759 Summary: osc fails with a python exception Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: BuildService Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: lmb(a)suse.com QA Contact: adrian(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- This is about the latest osc client on Factory (osc-0.150.1-158.1.noarch) used on the internal build service instance: # iosc rdiff Devel:Storage:1.0 _product SUSE:SLE-12:Update:Products:Cloud5 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/osc", line 26, in <module> r = babysitter.run(osccli) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/babysitter.py", line 61, in run return prg.main(argv) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/cmdln.py", line 343, in main return self.cmd(args) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/cmdln.py", line 366, in cmd retval = self.onecmd(argv) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/cmdln.py", line 500, in onecmd return self._dispatch_cmd(handler, argv) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/cmdln.py", line 1230, in _dispatch_cmd return handler(argv[0], opts, *args) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/commandline.py", line 3593, in do_rdiff expand=not opts.unexpand) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/core.py", line 4488, in server_diff_noex unified, missingok, meta, expand) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/core.py", line 4477, in server_diff f = http_POST(u) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/core.py", line 3201, in http_POST def http_POST(*args, **kwargs): return http_request('POST', *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/core.py", line 3144, in http_request install_opener(conf._build_opener(url)) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/conf.py", line 507, in _build_opener from . import oscssl File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osc/oscssl.py", line 8, in <module> import M2Crypto.httpslib File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/M2Crypto/__init__.py", line 24, in <module> import ASN1 File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/M2Crypto/ASN1.py", line 12, in <module> import BIO File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/M2Crypto/BIO.py", line 221, in <module> class CipherStream(BIO): File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/M2Crypto/BIO.py", line 227, in CipherStream SALT_LEN = m2.PKCS5_SALT_LEN AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'PKCS5_SALT_LEN' Most invocations fail like that for me, including "osc up", submitreq, etc, making it completely unusable for me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 21

[Bug 936416] New: harfbuzz 32bit devel package missing symlinks
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Feb '22

10 Feb '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=936416 Bug ID: 936416 Summary: harfbuzz 32bit devel package missing symlinks Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Factory Version: 201505* Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: admin(a)leinir.dk QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- The 32bit devel package of harfbuzz (and accompanying harfbuzz-icu) is missing the .so symlinks in /usr/lib. Temporary workaround: ln -s libharfbuzz.so.0 /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so ln -s libharfbuzz-icu.so.0 /usr/lib/libharfbuzz-icu.so -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 5

[Bug 954329] New: Purely virtual bridge breaks networking
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 08 Feb '22

08 Feb '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954329 Bug ID: 954329 Summary: Purely virtual bridge breaks networking Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: 2015* Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Network Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: lmb(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Take a purely virtual bridge (to be used for VMs) with a static network configuration: # cat /etc/sysconfig/network/ifcfg-br0 STARTMODE='auto' BOOTPROTO='static' BRIDGE='yes' BRIDGE_PORTS='' BRIDGE_FORWARDDELAY='0' BRIDGE_STP='off' IPADDR='172.16.1.1/24' enp0s25 is the local, normal ethernet interface which is working fine: 2: enp0s25: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 Now: # ifup br0 # ip link 2: enp0s25: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master br0 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 link/ether 28:d2:44:df:33:18 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 9: br0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 link/ether 28:d2:44:df:33:18 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff It seems that the scripts use the ethernet interface as the *default* value for BRIDGE_PORTS, which obviously then breaks networking. (If I had wanted a slaved network device, I'd have configured one.) brctl addbr br0 ; ip a add dev br0 172.16.1.1/24 ; ip link set br0 up creates the desired configuration just fine and is what I'd have expected given the configuration file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 9

[Bug 996088] New: After updates today (29/08/16) efibootmgr: Could not set BootOrder: No space left on device
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 28 Jan '22

28 Jan '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=996088 Bug ID: 996088 Summary: After updates today (29/08/16) efibootmgr: Could not set BootOrder: No space left on device Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Bootloader Assignee: jsrain(a)suse.com Reporter: stuart(a)stella-maris.org.uk QA Contact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- After performing an update today, 29/08/16, I decided to run efibootmgr -v as I have had issues before. I then found it returned BootCurrent: 0003 Timeout: 1 seconds No BootOrder is set; firmware will attempt recovery Boot0000* opensuse HD(1,GPT,2eca2750-fed6-4e3f-887f-27f183020fda,0x800,0x61800)/File(\EFI\opensuse\grubx64.efi) Boot0001* Hard Drive BBS(HD,,0x0) Boot0002* CD/DVD Drive BBS(CDROM,,0x0) After which I ran efibootmgr -o 0000,0001,0002 which returned efibootmgr: Could not set BootOrder: No space left on device I then tried both update-bootloader --reinit which failed, then grub2-install which failed as well. This ended up with no efi boot options at all. I had to resort to chrooting from TW rescue disk and re-install grub2 and recover my PC. So far I have not tried to run the update-bootloader --reinit or grub2-install again since recovering my system as I fear it will mess up the system once more. As part of the update various grub2 packages were updated all not at beta3-10 level, the zypper history shows dracut running but no apparent errors were reported there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 9

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
392
Older →

Jump to page:

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openSUSE Bugs October 2016